Showing All | Show by Page
|1 star:||(2)||Average Rating: |
Number of Ratings: 80
Write a review
- SchnickelFritz (TX), August 20, 2021
5 people found the following review helpful:
Long choice based game about escapism, choice, and the moon, March 26, 2021
I've often pondered on my reasons for reading novels, playing IF, reading stories online, etc. I've talked to my family about it, and my answers to why we escape and whether it is good changes fairly often. I also was oncea professional video game developer.
This game, then, drew me in completely. This is a choice-based game about someone who is trying to understand escapism, its role in life, its benefits and drawbacks, the meaning of art, etc.
It was fun to play the character as myself, giving the answers and reactions I would. I was happy with my ending.
It was funny to play this game after Ultra Business Tycoon III,and reading online debates over whether that game is winnable, and what it would mean if it is not winnable. I don't necessarily recommend playing that game first (Porpentine has better games, like Howling Dogs), but it was interesting.
Lynnea Glasser tends to make very good games. I didn't like Tenth Plague on philosophical grounds, but Coloratura was fantastic.
This game contains several instances of strong profanity near the beginning.
2 people found the following review helpful:
Space Love, March 20, 2021
tldr: An enjoyable IF despite a bit of rail-roading.
I love space and seeing this setting made me think of something that could quite actually happen in the near future. It was very enjoyable. Playing as someone in the service industry, and all the ups and downs that go with it, resonated with me. My favorite aspect of the game, however, was the game within a game. Following along with the story in a story was really enjoyable and, if it weren't a Choice of Games game, I would definitely go back and tool around some more.
My least favorite part of the game was when I was given a choice that was no choice. There were a couple, really, but the second time the lack of choice felt more like it was played for laughs. The first time really got under my skin, however: (Spoiler - click to show)When asked how competent the protagonist is in a rather stressful situation, I decided to go with the more optimistic route. I decided that I was prepared to deal with the situation at hand. However, the narrative second-guessed me and then grayed out that option. As there were other options similar to my initial choice, again I chose to see the protagonist as more on the competent side. Again the game second-guessed me. I did this until there was only one option left, the option that the game wanted for me and not the option that I wanted. It was very frustrating to say the least.
IF games already tend to be linear (some more than others) and taking away what little player agency I thought I had left a bitter taste in my mind. I was able to keep playing, but that keeps me from wanting to go back and play a second time to explore other avenues.
I'm not sure how intentional this was as the game in the game seemed to shadow another game: (Spoiler - click to show)The Mass Effect Trilogy, where the ending didn't seem to take into any serious account what the players had done throughout the game.
All in all, I would recommend playing through this game at least once.
- everlastingwonder (Massachusetts), March 19, 2021
- kekekeKaj, March 14, 2021
- mondegreen, February 11, 2021
- RhysRivers, February 2, 2021
- Zape, January 30, 2021
3 people found the following review helpful:
Better in retrospect, January 30, 2021
I first played Creatures Such As We a few years ago, and I remember that I didn't think much of it back then. But, after playing it more recently, I've come to appreciate it a lot more.
Creatures Such As We is a metafictional (am I using that term correctly?) story about video games that functions as one of the video games it discusses. On one level, you play as a tour guide on the moon, guiding a group of visiting game developers through various touristy activities. On the other level, your character is playing a game-within-a-game, which happens to be developed by the same group of aforementioned game developers. This game-within-a-game had a highly controversial "bad" ending, almost akin to the original ending of Mass Effect 3 (the author denies it as an influence). The player character suddenly has the opportunity to ask the game developers about the ending. Of course, being a Choice of Game, there is romance here: you can pursue a romantic relationship or friendship with one of the game developers, and you might stay in contact even after they leave. There is a bit of stage magic here; the dramatic life-and-death moments always happen to your chosen romance option. The characters themselves are all well-realized and unique, but they feel sort of like tokens, both demographically and for their particular viewpoints.
All of this is all used as a backdrop for a series of philosophical conversations. The author leads us through "meta" discussions like the role of the author vs the viewer, representation in media, and escapism, and more general philosophical discussions on death and life and stuff. I think this worked better for me now than when I first played this because I have more experience with both making and playing interactive fiction, and I can relate to the issues being discussed more. It felt interesting and engaging in a way that "philosophical discussions in video games" usually don't for me.
Then there's the theme of corporate malfeasance. Your employer cares more about good appearances than the well-being of its employees or the safety of its customers. The visitors to the moon base are regularly put into life-threatening situations with little backup or real information. You are overworked without much free time, and it's clear that there are people even worse off. Then there is a subplot where one of the tourists has a flu-like illness that is covered up; it's obvious that this was made in pre-covid times. At the same time, an EA-like giant gaming corporation is seeking to acquire the game developers, who are somewhat ambivalent about the deal (I don't know if you-as-the-tour-guide can change the outcome here).
Overall, I feel like the setting, characters, game-within-a-game, and philosophical discussions all meshed together really well. I appreciated the meta moments where it felt like the game was critiquing itself.
- TheBoxThinker, January 18, 2021
- mifga (Brooklyn, NY), October 15, 2020
- quackoquack, June 10, 2020
- Saturnara, March 19, 2020
- antperson, February 27, 2020
- Marc-André Goyette, December 24, 2019
- Ry (Philippines), September 30, 2019
- lunaterra (Atlanta, GA, USA), May 10, 2019
- Max Crow (United States), February 13, 2019
- Joey Jones (UK), September 15, 2018
- Jacoder23, September 13, 2018
- fooberticus, August 13, 2018
- Aimski (Michigan), May 6, 2018
- Stas, April 2, 2018
- Sobol (Russia), January 5, 2018
- Julia Myer (USA), August 29, 2017
- Wanderlust, August 3, 2017
- doodlelogic, July 26, 2017
- John Ayliff (Vancouver, BC), June 13, 2017
- Laney Berry, May 15, 2017
- chargefire, January 25, 2017
- magicnumber, January 13, 2017
- Andromache (Hawaii), September 17, 2016
- TheAncientOne, August 27, 2016
- Herman van Wietmarschen (Driebergen, the Netherlands), August 5, 2016
- kala (Finland), August 1, 2016
4 people found the following review helpful:
A convincing essay on game theory camouflaged as romantic CYOA, July 21, 2016
Having played through Mass Effect 3 again recently, I could not help but view "Creatures" as a commentary on that game, and in particular on the discussions revolving around its ending. I did not check if that is even possible, but in any case: "Creatures" covers a lot of game theory relevant to ME 3, like whether players or authors should decide a games ending, how romance should be portrayed in games, the meaning of self-sacrifice, whether games should mirror life or rather provide means of escape, etc.
This is all packed into a well paced story on the PCs moon adventure with the designers of their favorite game, including that game as game within the game.
So why is "Creatures" not five stars for me? I think it lacks a bit on the game side of things. Most choices I really had to think about concerned my opinion on the game theory questions mentioned above. The choices regarding the actual plot seemed a bit bland in comparison, even though the story itself is quite compelling.
That caveat aside, in my opinion anyone even remotely interested in game design (and romance!) should play "Creatures Such As We".
- eyeballkidable, July 17, 2016
- kybrsmith, June 23, 2016
- Aselia, May 13, 2016
- Matt Bates, May 10, 2016
- zylla, May 1, 2016
- Artran (Prague, Czech Republic), April 18, 2016
- Brendan Patrick Hennessy (Toronto, Ontario), March 24, 2016
16 people found the following review helpful:
Not even the appearance of choice, March 24, 2016
At one point, you are asked to choose between different ways of instructing people to operate telescopes. You are not told the advantages and disadvantages of each, neither before or after. None of your choices make any difference.
Creatures Such As We is a story about someone who has a crush on a generic video game character. He is upset because there is a obviously scripted fight at the end and a boring ending. The game in question is said to be otherwise be good.
At one point, you can complain about female representation in video games. The main character is having trouble telling the difference between games and reality. The other characters feel this is perfectly normal.
Creatures Such As We is a story about games written by someone who has never played one.
- Hannah Powell-Smith, February 4, 2016
- Veraloo, January 20, 2016
- CMG (NYC), January 11, 2016
- Onirim (Argentina), December 24, 2015
- Catalina, November 18, 2015
- Saerise, October 13, 2015
- BRSanders (Denver, CO), October 4, 2015
- Shayrenn, September 21, 2015
- verityvirtue (London), September 9, 2015
- leanbh, August 1, 2015
- magic sympathy, May 31, 2015
- Lanternpaw, May 19, 2015
- AngelKurisu, April 27, 2015
- Doug Orleans (Somerville, MA, USA), April 1, 2015
- Vendae, March 25, 2015
- hoopla, March 24, 2015
- Mike Root, March 23, 2015
- Khalisar (Italy), March 17, 2015
- Matt W (San Diego, CA), February 27, 2015
- Victor Gijsbers (The Netherlands), February 23, 2015
6 people found the following review helpful:
Most moving IF I've played, January 23, 2015
This brought me to tears. I just finished it. I felt probably halfway through that I would have to write a review immediately.
I've played a lot of IF in my life. I've really explored the world of Modern IF in the last 7 or 8 years, playing lots of old comp games mostly. I've observed the community as an
outsider and generally been very impressed. Very organized and welcoming web presence. Clearly a committed, mature and sensible group. As well as creative and flexible.
On that note-- my nostalgic side is a bit offended by the multiple choice nature of this game. Some stubborn part of me can't let go of the frustrated hours I spent guessing
verbs or games I had to give up on for months or years at a time because I was stumped by some ridiculous puzzle. (It took me until high school to finally beat this old game
"skulduggery" that I started at probably age 8 or so. The advent of the internet finally let me find the solution online.)
Anyway, I'm going all tangential; my point is that I'm in the end quite pleased that for the last 20 years we've had a crowdsourcing of IF. Because it's all volunteer and money is
basically out of the equation, people have been free to experiment and develop the art form. I would guess that the obscurity of it and the technical nature explain why the
genre attracts such a disproportionately large amount of talent despite the meagre size of the audience/artist community.
Again, I'm avoiding talking about this game...
I really want to do it justice, perhaps that's why. Like the protagonist of the game, and all of us creatures such as we are, I am capable of myriad forms of self-distraction and self-deception.
My initial evaluation was that the game is far from perfect. I was confused and felt that surely it wasn't completely my fault. What is driving my choices here? Does Glasser want me to role play? Is she trying to lead meto adopt a certain role for the character, or is the game open-ended and truly a choose your own adventure story?
Fortunately, Glasser is a firm leader, just like the protagonist, and this became more and more evident. Probably about halfway into it, I let go of my own doubts and just went along for the ride. It became utterly clear to me who the protaganist is supposed to be, and how she would respond to various situations. I don't know how Glasser did it, but she convinced me hook line and sinker. I would be very disappointed if the game is indeed completely flat, and that my choices don't affect the outcome at all.
I haven't looked at other reviews or tried to replay the game. I see that the game came in second place. I've played the first place game-- In my view it is not even in the same league as this one. Hunger Daemon I would call a very well-crafted, delightful diversion. This game is breathtaking literature.
Great art, it's trite but true to say, is often underappreciated. My guess would be that a lot of people simply never understood where Glasser was going with this thing. Trying to be objective and catch my breath for a minute, I'm sure this game really is far from perfect. I'm sure Glasser could've created more consistent clues and cues to lead the gamer down the right path. I think it would serve her to be less heavy-handed and didactic at times. I don't think the web interface allows for easy replay of moves. Probably this is intentional on Glasser's part. However, for me, it would've helped me get into the story if I could've more easily tested my hypothesis that my choices really did dramatically change the story. I assume Glasser is trying to draw an analogy between the tourists in her story, and we the people playing her game. Like the protagonist in the story, Glasser is tightly and self-consciously controlling our experience.
Her brilliance is in earning our trust, just as the satisfaction of the protagonist comes through earning the trust of the tourists she supervises. And I am telling you, Lynnea, that you could've earned my trust more completely and quickly by giving me more trust.
On the other hand, I am guessing you gave too much trust to many of the people who played this game. My guess would be that this would account for the lower average reviews-- probably a lot of people just never figured it out.
A limitation of the art form. And in the end, that's just our loneliness again, isn't it? Whether face to face on the moon, communicating via text on a screen in a chatroom, or through the perhaps even less immediate medium of a novel or text adventure, none of us will ever inhabit the skin of another. Unless of course some sort of horrific human centipede reality manifests :-)
Thanks for the awesome game!!! And sorry about the rambling and embarassingly high level of incoherence in this review. I just wanted to get it out well I was still raw-- and like the protagonist I am busy and don't know when I'd have a chance to write this other than late at night after finishing the game.
So yeah, thanks again!
- bluevelvetwings, November 29, 2014
- ShaftD, November 26, 2014
- NJ (Ontario), November 22, 2014
- E.K., November 18, 2014
- Nusco (Bologna, Italy), November 17, 2014
- The Xenographer, November 17, 2014
- Joshua Houk, November 16, 2014
- Floating Info, November 16, 2014
- BlitzWithGuns, November 16, 2014
- Anya Johanna DeNiro (Minnesota), November 13, 2014
- Karl Ove Hufthammer (Bergen, Norway), November 11, 2014
- EllaClass, November 5, 2014
- kz, October 21, 2014
- Tranmoor, October 20, 2014
- Mona Mae (South Africa), October 11, 2014
Showing All | Show by Page | Return to game's main page