Return to the game's main page Reviews and Ratings
Previous | << 1 2 3 >> | Next | Show All - Molly (USA), July 25, 2012 - Ben Treat (Maine, USA), July 8, 2012 - Andrew Schultz (Chicago), May 14, 2012 - stadtgorilla (Munich, Germany), April 17, 2012 - Kendi, February 8, 2012 - Jaxcap (Arizona), December 10, 2011 - Hannes, November 12, 2011 - EJ, November 1, 2011 - Wade Clarke (Sydney, Australia), September 15, 2011 - Sophronisba, May 13, 2011 - Ben Cressey (Seattle, WA), April 16, 2011 - JohnW (Brno, Czech Republic), March 16, 2011 - ifwizz (Berlin, Germany), January 2, 2011 - eu, January 1, 2011 - Bernie (Fredericksburg, VA), December 19, 2010 - tungol, December 13, 2010 - Kake (London, England), December 7, 2010 4 of
4 people found the following review helpful:
Floundering was never this fun, November 28, 2010by The Year Is Yesterday (California) Death Off The Cuff offers an intriguing premise: a famous detective, you've gathered all the suspects for that all-important scene in which you will reveal the true identity of the murderer. The only problem is that you haven't the first clue who that might be. In order to attempt to trick the culprit into a confession, you begin to spout off about whatever's at hand, using the command "talk about" for the majority of interactions, although examine and a few other verbs play a role. You can only talk about things that are visible in the room around you, a clever method of conflating the player with the PC, who is of course casting around desperately for any topic that might yield a confession. Nor is that the only way in which the player and the PC think alike: since neither of you know what you're doing, you'll spend most of the game suggesting random or arbitrary topics of conversation in the hopes that something sticks. The result is impressive in terms of putting you in the shoes of the detective; however, it's too arbitrary to be consistently enjoyable. The limitations on action, and the one-room nature of the game, keep things simple enough for the story to unfold tightly, and there are more than a few twists and turns. Typing "help" at any point will provide a hint on what to do next, and if you get fed up you can always accuse the wrong person. In all, a brief, linear diversion that's slightly more clever than it is fun. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Remove vote | Add a comment
7 of
7 people found the following review helpful:
A bit of light fun, November 28, 2010I know that there are other murder-mystery IF games out there, but this is the first one I’ve played, and I have to say I really enjoyed myself. I really liked how it excused the fact that you the player don’t know what’s gone on. You are a detective with everyone gathered in the room to make the big-finish accusation, but the detective doesn’t have a clue who the murderer is. So you’re just making random observations about people, hoping that they will confess or in some way slip up. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Remove vote | Add a comment
- Rose (New Zealand), November 24, 2010 - Wendymoon, November 18, 2010 - Mr. Patient (Saint Paul, Minn.), November 16, 2010 - Mark Jones (Los Angeles, California), November 16, 2010 - perching path (near Philadelphia, PA, US), November 13, 2010 - Rhian Moss (UK), November 7, 2010
|