Reviews by MathBrush

This game has an intriguing concept. Your enemy has promised to never give you back a medallion that you once gave her.

But you'll get it back, even after she's been (Spoiler - click to show)cremated.

It looks like the game can't be finished. No one in the itch comments describes finishing the game, and one person had the same issue with me, that the medallion can never be interacted with. (Spoiler - click to show)Following the exact sequence of moves described on the itch page, I hear the medallion and it says I find it, but trying to exam or take it gives an error message.

Overall, it looks neat and I'd love to see the ending. It's short, made with just 500 words as part of a competition.

This is a very short French game entered as part of a competition using games of 500 words or less.

In it, you are Santa and you want to burn the gifts that millionaires give to their families. You can either choose to (with your laser-assisted reindeer) or not.

After two burn options, you can get a third.

There's not much to the game, just an amusing idea.

This is a short French game in Ink. There are always two choices: "nous" [us] and "je" [we].

It tells the story of a burgeoning civilization, learning to find food and learn language. Choosing 'nous' gives communal results, while 'je' gives individual results.

It's a fairly short game, with two endings which the author says are meant to lead us to reflection. I thought it was pretty interesting, but I felt like the plot was a little generic, and it would have been nice to have some effect of mixing the two options or some other effect of the choices.

It was pretty fun though!

This game is structured like a linear visual story, with black and white hand-drawn images. It won the Short Game Showcase.

Here are the criteria I use to judge things with:

-Polish: The game is both polished and Polish (the author is from Poland), so it doubly fits here. More seriously, the game uses a variety of textual techniques to vary the appearance and the writing had no typos that I saw.
-Descriptiveness: The writing was vivid and I was able to picture what was going on.
-Interactivity/Use of medium: While there was little interactivity, I also use this category for the artwork and structure of visual novels. The art definitely contributed to the overall feeling here, expressing disinterested observation, alienation, fear, isolation, and determination.
-Emotional impact: I actually originally played this game for the first few pages a while ago and stopped because I didn't like what it was about. Finishing it later, it was not what I had originally expected. Both times I felt a strong emotional reaction.
-Would I play again?: Yes, I think I would, there's a lot here that is of interest.

Naarel is a prolific author who has a great back-catalogue. Because of that, I think I've been spoiled a bit with their back-catalogue. This particular game, while it has a compelling narrative, lacks some of the awesome interactions or beautiful styling/images I've seen in their other games.

What's this one about? A train is passing by (in fact, it will always pass you by!) which causes you to reflect on your place in life, your hopes, your dreams, your constraints.

Choices are one per page, with a little bit of fancy choice-usage near the end. The story is neatly divided into chunks of relatively similar size to each other.

The style of writing is evocative and emotional. It uses different sense, mentions concrete details, and has a nice plot arc in a short space.

This game was made specifically for Emily Short by Sam Kabo Ashwell, and contains a great deal of procedural generation.

The idea is that you're sorting through a large collection of scents that you created during your life. Each one has a collection of smells and a unique bottle that it finds itself in. Each one also brings to mind a specific memory from the past. You can then associate different parts of the smell with different parts of the memory.

In the end, you can conceive of a smell that includes all the elements and memories you chose, even if it could never exist in reality.

The writing is descriptive and evocative. The game uses vorple and has great-looking UI and transitions. I played it a couple of times to see how it worked and what variations there are. It has a definite kind of feeling to it, a kind of worldliness and world-weariness. When confronted with its procedural nature and open-endedness, I struggled to find any meaning in my choices, feeling like it was more like a brainstorming session or tarot reading (which may be a plus for some). Glad I played! Good writing.

This is a Bitsy game, which uses two-color-palette minimalist pixel art and arrow controls to create a world to navigate, and text pops up when you run into certain interactive parts.

The story is a poetic description of the impact whales have on marine life both while they live and after they die. Its fairly brief, and the whole thing hinges on the writing being good, which it really is.

The artwork pushes Bitsy to its limits, with majestic whales, beating hearts, deep sea life, dithered gradients, and more. The music fits the game quite well.

Not too long, but enjoyable.

In this game, you are diving to explore the ocean as an underwater photographer. As you do so, you run into a real, live mermaid!

Interspersed with mermaid dialog, you can explore a little bit, with the game having a small world model. I played once and wasn't able to see everything, so it seems like the game makes replays worth it.

The character dialog was convincing and the game made use of its format effectively with its cheerful drawings and appropriate music. Short but fun.

This was a neat experiment in a game jam designed to use non-gamemaking tools to make games.

This is a forum thread where the idea is that you read through the edit history to see what happened. It seems to me like someone having a breakdown and then it being covered up. Who covered it up, though? The government? Another personality? Parents?

It's a fun concept. Its open nature allows you to think of many possibilities but also hampers the story due to not providing enough answers to really pull you in. But a fun and unique idea.

This was a pleasant, compact Adventuron game. It had a feature I’m not used to seeing, where right-clicking on yellow words brought up possible actions. I don’t think it was all possible actions, because in both cases I tried it it only brought up ‘Examine’, but I thought it was cool!

The idea is that you’ve accidentally released the ghosts of your ancestors and you have to capture them back into the box you got them from.

There are two main ghosts to catch, each with a couple of puzzles. These puzzles were well-thought out; it looks like this Petite Mort game went for polishing a smaller-scope game rather than pushing out a bigger untested game. I think that was a smart choice! This setup would easily allow expansion if the author ever desired to do so, and I would look forward to that. Still, it’s pretty good as-is.