Reviews by MathBrush

Adaptations are a fraught area of interactive fiction. How close do you stay to the original? Do you introduce choices by allowing people to select from previously existing scenes, or do you vary between the 'canon' story and your own selections?

This is a cyberpunk adaptation of Anne of Green Gables. It takes selected events from the book and replaces references to farm and country life to references to web connectivity, corporations, devices, and hacking.

In structure, it has long pages of text, usually with a 'next' button at the button, with larger choices happening a few times per chapter. The text per choice is much larger than is usual for Twine or Choicescript; for me, it was reminiscent of Chooseyourstory games, which often have the same 'several pages followed by a weighty choice' format.

I read Anne of Green Gables and watched shows about it a bit as a kid, but at the time I thought it was meant for even younger kids than me, so I didn't pay it much attention.

So, with vague memories of Anne of Green Gables, I read this interactive fiction game. At several points I thought, "How close is this to the original?" and looked up the Project Gutenberg copy. Reading through passages of it was a real delight. It's clear why this book has endured so long; the characterization and dialogue writing are exceptional, a generational talent. For my personal tastes, my favorite writer for voice and style has been Arthur Conan Doyle, but Anne of Green Gables compares very well with that. Other authors can have some mediocre 'local' writing that is supported by great global plot structure, but these two are great at the line by line writing.

This became a problem while playing the game, because while Brett is actually a good author (you should check out his other games!) I began comparing all of his additions directly to the real story, and they suffered by comparison. It's like having the star player of your local college play against MJ, or being tasked with adding a flying saucer and aliens to Van Gogh's Starry Night.

One example is when Anne meets Diana. In both versions, she declares that the two of them should be bosom friends and should declare their affection to each other by swearing an oath (all this after having exchanged less than five sentences with each other).

In this version, Anne says:
"We ought to make this vow over running water. I assume under the ground here are some water pipes. That'll do."

In the original, Anne says:
“We must join hands—so,” said Anne gravely. “It ought to be over running water. We’ll just imagine this path is running water."

The first one is amusing; taking a serious vow requirement and just halfway-ignoring it. The second is extremely amusing to me: Anne has just met this brand-new girl, instantly declared herself best friends, concocted a very elaborate oath, and then instantly says it's okay to ignore reality by using their imagination. This connects to the overall theme of a lot of the book, of Anne living in a realm of imagination and fantasy, being brought down to earth by Marilla. So this scene fulfills one useful narrative role in the game, but many roles in the book.

Similarly, other great passages from their book lose their weight in this world. Anne's flights of fancy in the original contrast with her mundane world; in this version, she's surrounded by the bizarre and fanciful at all times, with endless amounts of entertainment. In the original, Matthew's fate is a solemn capstone on the whole book, something that immediately and inescapably focuses Anne's life on reality. In this version, it's a somber event that is then succeeded by the 'true' finale, which is perhaps the most fanciful event of the story and teaches a different moral, that Anne does have agency against tragic events in life, that trying hard enough can overcome any obstacle, and that living in her fanciful realm is the true path.

When reading the directly adapted parts, I preferred looking up the original and reading that. When reading the newly-minted parts, I enjoyed learning more about the world and trying out the mechanics.

With all of this said, I still think this is one of the better adaptations of pre-existing text I've seen. All adaptations run into the issues I've mentioned; I wrote a Sherlock Holmes game with text from Arthur Conan Doyle, and I had the same issue of my own text contrasting poorly with Doyle's, and struggling to balance linearity/faithfulness with branching/new material. I think that Anne of Green Cables succeeds better than my own game, or than Graham Nelson's The Tempest. But its greatest effect on me was making me want to read through the whole book (or listen to audiobook; it seems like it would be great in that format).

Andrew Schultz's wordplay games can be presented on a spectrum between "the wordplay puzzles are extremely hard to guess without automated tools and/or lawnmowering" and "the entire game is trivial". This game is one of several that hit a sweet spot in the middle, closer to (but not on!) the easier side.

The mechanic here (which I won't reveal for spoilers) has small complexity and can be sounded out most of the time, making it not too bad. Another of this author's games, Wipe Out, is his third-highest rated game on IFDB, and I expect this one to end up high on that list as well.

I happily plowed through much of the early game and got about 35 out of 64 points on my own. After that, I had to consult the guide about 3-4 times. The main times I had to consult it were for puzzles that went beyond wordplay and required leaps of insight or finding patterns. I think those extra puzzles were interesting, and I wonder if I could have worked them out if I had been more diligent.

The plot is mostly held together by a common food-based theme. I enjoyed the help system and found it easier to use than some other games by this author, and I thought the ending was fun, though.

This was a longer, thoughtful Twine game with a clickable world map and heavy inventory use. The inventory occupies a side bar, and different elements light up in red and become clickable when in the appropriate location, allowing for some complexity.

The story is about a future where carbon dioxide is so prevalent that the air is poisonous to humans. Everyone lives underground while above-ground scientists work to purify the air. The purification plant has stopped working, though, and so you, a young girl, have been sent to the above-ground lands to try to get it working again.

The writing is melancholic and wistful. Simultaneously, I was excited by the writing style but found it hard to focus on. You have to click to make each line appear for some pages, which wasn’t too bad, but the slightly slower pace and the desolation of each passage made it easier for my mind to drift away from the game.

Mechanically, you basically plow through the map (I love being able to click directly on the map to skip to a room I’d been in before), and there are rooms with obstacles and rooms with obstacle removers (like locks and keys, for instance). There is a timer of sorts (your oxygen tank) but I think it’s cued to story beats and not to your actions, which is great. Near the end there are some trickier puzzles, but the puzzles in general aren’t too hard, allowing the story to take center stage.

I think this game nailed the atmosphere it was going for (no pun intended). The design UI is great. Something about the whole project didn’t draw me in fully, but that’s a completely subjective experience, and I did find it above-average for an IF-game.

This is my third game I've played by Mr Hoffmann. I've had essentially the same experience with all three: I encountered them in a German competition, where they are by far the largest game. However, since they use drop down menus, I can often get far even without knowing a lot of verbs. However, after an hour or three of gameplay, I realized I only have 100 points out of 1000 or 2000 or 3000. So I give up, then later find the game in an English competition, where I can complete it. The only one that didn't follow that pattern is Phoney Island, a german-only game about Trump being evil that I finished in German.

This game has you investigating a store after its owner has mysteriously disappeared. There is a lot of merchandise, junk, and random stuff in the shop, all of which you can investigate and put together.

The multiple choice menus help here a lot, just like before. There are a lot of specific verbs we need, like 'unscrew' and 'wedge' and so on, and the menus help with that. There are also three levels of hints for many puzzles, which is nice.

However, sometimes these systems fall apart. There are times when the multiple choice menu has the right verb but using it puts the noun in the wrong part of the sentence, causing it to fail. Sometimes the right word doesn't appear in the menu at all, so you need to type it, and often there are two places the word can be (the object being used and the object it's being used on) and you have to look at both objects to find it. Similarly, many of the puzzles have many conceivable solutions but you are forced into only one.

Overall, I think people will enjoy this who enjoy parser games for their ability to let you wander around a large space, tinkering with things, getting funny messages, and just existing in a parser world.

I often leave Arthur DiBianca's games to the end as a treat, but I decided to play this one early as part of my effort to play longer IFComp games.

You play as a hacker with a device that lets you hook into any system that has a certain kind of computer component. Your goal is to infiltrate a building and wreak havoc on an Agency, following a list of objectives. I'd definitely take inventory first in this game!

This game took me 2 hours, with 1 hour for a single puzzle (one of the last ones) and 1 hour for all the rest put together. I also ended up using the walkthrough for that puzzle.

This game is a limited parser game where all puzzles involve moving a character around a screen. There are a variety of mini-puzzles, although almost all have blurred in my mind after the time spent on that one puzzle. Many of them require optimization, memorization, and experimentation. Gameplay is closer to Baba is You or Adventures of Lolo than standard interactive fiction gameplay. This is a series of graphical games written in Inform connected by an interactive fiction overworld.

Some of the subgames involve clever gimmicks that require some sideways thinking. Others can become tedious; one such game was a game where you have to memorize a map before navigating it in the dark, with any mistake sending you to the front. The first few of these were really fun, while the last few felt like homework with copying down lists of commands.

One of the very last puzzles had a countdown timer based on moves, and that's the one I spent an hour on. It's an optimization puzzle with a very large set of parameters. I attempted it from a lot of different mental angles, trying different strategies and approaches. I often got within a single move or two of the finale, after shaving off ten or twenty moves from my first approach. In the end, I followed the walkthrough, and there were just a few moves off of my approach.

I think most of the game was pretty fun, and I enjoyed the final door puzzle especially.

This was a refreshing game to play. In a time where a lot of games are using AI art or text that is bland and often nonsensical, this game stood out to me for its distinct art style (I think a combination of watercolors and something else?) and its well-planned, symmetric plot and characters.

This is one of only two games marked 'over two hours' on the website, and I spent about 4 hours from start to finish, but it would probably be about 2.5 hours if I locked in.

It's a wholesome game, the same way Eikas by by Lauren O'Donoghue is (for those who remember it from last IFComp). Both focus on relationships and nature in a nature setting and take place over a long period of time.

This game has its own unique elements, though. You are a newcomer to a town with a magical villa, with beautiful gardens, a mysterious library, and four characters, each having a tragic element in their lives as well as an interest in you. You yourself are afflicted by sleepwalking fits that take you into the garden at night.

All four characters have friendship paths and romance paths on top of that. I ended up romancing Penny the botanist and befriending the others.

Design-wise, some of the game does suffer from from having large, complex option and dialogue trees but requiring you to plow through almost all of them, which can feel like a chore at times, although the writing is charming. There are also options where you choose how to react, but these often boil down to "Be nice, be indifferent, be mean," with little use for the mean option (that I found). On the other hand, the ending choice was very well done, and I had to sit and contemplate for a while on what I'd pick, and there were both good and bad consequences to my choice. It's one of the best ethical dilemmas I've had in a game for a while. Similarly, there are some puzzle elements which are pretty fun, most of them relatively light but requiring at least some notetaking (one puzzle in particular feels like an Ocarina of Time reference to me).

Overall, I think that it would have been better to slow down and take the game in at a relaxed pace rather than rushing for the competition, as this is a pretty mellow and chill game to settle down with; a good game to play while drinking warm cider, snuggled up on the couch when it rains or snows outside.

There are two other games by this author in the competition; I definitely am looking forward to them now!

Murderworld, by Austin Auclair

I had both high and low expectations for this game. Austin Auclair previously wrote His Majesty's Royal Space Navy Service Handbook, which I enjoyed quite a bit. On the other hand, this game is X-men fan fiction, and many fan fiction parser games in the past haven't been that good.

Overall, I had a good experience with this game. It's big (it took me exactly 4 hours to play with total concentration, and the file is 6mb. I swear I saw Austin on blusky with an image showing this game has over 500K words, which I would believe, but I'm not sure it's the same game).

The idea is that you get to play as a ton of different x-men. You start off with a brief tutorial on a plane, then you have a chance to pick one of six different X-men to use to solve a major problem at the X-men's mansion. You don't swap between them; instead, the game just has six different paths through this section, which is quite long in itself. I played as Storm, which was fun given her powers.

This is about where the title screen drops. I'll spoiler the rest, although everything in this spoiler is only about as descriptive as the above and doesn't give much away (it's essentially the same as reading the table of contents of the walkthrough).

The game contains a set of young characters that I thought came from other media but which seem to be completely invented by the author. They fit well enough that I didn't really suspect that they were OCs (if they're not, someone can correct me!).

This game managed to avoid several of the flaws that very long games often have in IFComp. Instead of one sprawling world where everything is interconnected and you have to lawnmower trying every item in every room, the game silos off each section, so each section uses only the objects and people immediately available. It essentially is a collection of minigames with an overarching story, and I love that setup (I've used it for several games myself). It is also much more polished and fair than many long IFComp games, which can at times be very buggy or filled with impossible puzzles. I never had to consult the walkthrough, although I did use 'mission' a lot to remind myself of the goal, only realizing a little later on that it functions as a kind of in-game hint nudge (which I really appreciated). There are lots of blank white lines (a common issue for all inform programmers) and I did frequently try typing things that didn't work, but the VERBS command always got me back on track.

I like the plot; I'm divided on the writing. It's clear that Austin Auclair is talented at executing his desired goal, I just have some minor quibbles with the goal itself. Two things that stuck out were character descriptions and overall emotions. The descriptions are focused on detailing the costumes of the characters in minute detail; this seemed more like a replacement for visual media rather than writing for writing's sake, if that makes any sense, kind of like alt-text for a picture. The descriptions for the OCs were much more natural which makes sense, as that was 'pure Auclair' and not a reassurance that the x-men are in their authentic costumes. As for the emotions, I felt like the setup made this game very dramatic, but when we arrive at the disaster everyone seems relaxed and chill, joking almost. This fits in great with the comedic later segments (appropriate for the 'Murderworld' setting) but that initial dissonance of 'why are we pranking each other with the phone when people might be dying?' threw me off.

Dialogue is appropriate for X-men. I thought Storm was stilted and Scott was cringe, both of which are 100% accurate. Nightcrawler's segment had some great dialogue, and I enjoyed the final battle (and the reveal of who the true instigator is and why (Spoiler - click to show)Storm was spared).

I think people will like this. You don't have to be an X-men expert to solve this, as there are numerous help systems (especially VERBS) to remind you of what the powers are. This is probably one of the best superhero parser games I've played, similar to the Earth and Sky series' later entries. My big gripe with most superhero games is that I really want to use my powers, but most games limit you severely in how you can use them. This game really thinks out the limits of your superpowers, and lets you use them quite a bit (Storm gets a big playground for doing all sorts of weather shenanigans, Wolverine can chop up almost everything, etc.). With my minor gripes, I'd rate this a 9/10 or 4.5/5, which I'll round up to 5 on IFDB. (I won't mention most of my ratings here on intfiction, but I thought this one would be good).

I've been going through the cheapest Hosted Games, which are self-published games hosted on the Choice of Games platform.

This game has you play as a young adult in a war-torn kingdom who bounces between rival factions for the government while escaping a cult and gathering magic items.

The core concept of the game is a good one, and there is some fun in using magic spells and working with your one-eyed friend/romantic option partner to face off against enemies, and there are some mysteries set up with satisfying payoffs.

It needs a lot of work, though. There are numerous typos, including on the first full page of text. The pacing in terms of paragraph breaks, reactions to significant events, page breaks and word choices is really off. In four succeeding paragraphs, the player can have a loved one violently die, train for a week to buy a horse, ride it for a couple of days, then leave it behind, all while cracking jokes. Your partner can randomly offer you sex 'with no strings' despite very little other romance happening in the game. For some reason, the country map is a map of Turkey.

I think the author is capable of making this very solid; typos can be fixed with more beta testing, and the pacing whiplash could be solved by putting each major event on its own screen and fleshing it out with some more reactions by the player or descriptions of the surroundings or events. This definitely seems like the talent is there, but more time could be invested.

This game starts out with abstract text in an unreadable font. It soon changes, so I'll put the rest in spoilers.

(Spoiler - click to show)You discover that you are in the arms of your mother, who can provide you with drinks, words, etc. You can look out the window or at your mother. At times, it seems like there is no way to progress, but as you complete the cycle, you can. There are 3 achievements; I got one of 3.

The more you play, the more you realize that there is something else going on here, a different genre and setting. The vocabulary used is grim and strong in this game. I found it interesting and was glad to play it.

This is a Neo-Twiny Jam game about a relationship where you and the other person meet and care about each other but there is, it seemed like to me, space between the two of you, a lack of complete emotional intimacy. I enjoyed the writing, and it brought to mind some close friends of my own in a positive way.

The text is on a timer, specifically a very slow timer and it refreshes to a new screen each time the timer goes off, with no way to go back, so you have to sit very still and watch carefully to avoid missing anything. Text comes in passages with each passage having three sentences followed by a binary choice. The game lasts around 4 choices, so it doesn't take too long to play. I found this pretty frustrating, which was balanced by my enjoyment of the lovely way the writing connected with me.