RetroCON 2021

by Sir Slice

2021

Web Site

Return to the game's main page

Reviews and Ratings

5 star:
(0)
4 star:
(0)
3 star:
(1)
2 star:
(3)
1 star:
(0)
Average Rating:
Number of Ratings: 4
Write a review


1-4 of 4


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
Inoffensive minigames, December 23, 2021
by Mike Russo (Los Angeles)
Related reviews: IF Comp 2021

(This is a lightly-edited version of a review posted to the IntFict forums during the 2021 IFComp. My son Henry was born right before the Comp, meaning I was fairly sleep-deprived and loopy while I played and reviewed many of the games, so in addition to a highlight and lowlight, the review includes an explanation of how new fatherhood has led me to betray the hard work the author put into their piece)

Okay, real talk: I found RetroCON 2021 Ė a low-key, low-plot collection of minigames Ė kind of boring. But as the last game to come up in my Comp queue, actually it was kind of pleasant to have something so inoffensive to close things out. It was nice to dip into the seven different activities on offer, dig into the one or two that interested me, and quit without feeling like I needed to exhaust everything the game has to offer. Itís an inoffensive time-waster Ė and an impressive demonstration of programming skill Ė thatís not especially memorable, but sometimes thereís a place for that.

There is a thin frame story tying this all together: youíre in Vegas for a retro gaming convention, providing justification for the three different games on offer as well as four opportunities for gambling. But there are no characters to interact with in this layer, or any consequences so far as I could tell for winning games or money, so itís really just there as a semi-elaborate menu for the minigames. Iíd roughly divide these into the fun ones, the duds, and those that are fine but left me cold. In the third bucket Iíd put all the gambling ones Ė Iíve never found straight games of chance at all compelling, so the horse-betting, keno, and slot machine didnít hold my attention for more than a minute. The fourth gambling game Ė video poker Ė Iíd technically classify as fun, though thereís nothing novel about this implementation so I didnít feel inclined to spend much time on it either.

That leaves the three games, which are presented as retro throwbacks to old, late 70s-early 80s video games. Two of them fall into my dud category, sad to say: thereís a zombie-themed card game you play against the computer that relies heavily on take-that gameplay, meaning that in my first go-round it took me 22 turns before I could do anything at all useful, at which point the computer was a turn away from winning. Thereís also a text-based football game thatís got a complex and interesting set of choices, though I found it was tuned too hard to be fun (my passes failed just about every time, even when the defense was focusing on the running game).

Thankfully, the final game is a full, albeit small text adventure, with a text parser integrated into Twine. This isnít anything to write home about, as the parser is pretty bare bones, the adventure has a generic plot (youíre searching for a hidden inheritance from your uncle), and thereís only one and a half puzzles to solve, though there are two solutions. But again, at least for me at the end of the Comp, I enjoyed going through the generic house and yard, searching the furniture for hidden keys, and working out simple challenges that donít overstay their welcome. With a more robust frame story, some incentives to reward success in the minigames, and a smoother difficulty curve for some of the rougher ones, RetroCON 2021 could have been more than the sum of its parts Ė but eh, as is there are still worse ways to kill twenty minutes.

Highlight: I took two runs through the horse-racing game, and in the second one I won big putting my money on the dark-horse contender, so that was fun (and a nice justification for stopping gambling now that I was ahead).

Lowlight: I only dimly remembered what Keno was, and then once I clicked on it I remembered that itís the worldís most boring ďgameĒ (you pick a bunch of numbers, then they get called or not).

How I failed the author: I played this one with only half my brain at best, but I think thatís more or less the expectation here so hopefully itís not too big a failure to wrap up on!


- Karl Ove Hufthammer (Bergen, Norway), November 15, 2021

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
No joy, November 4, 2021

These games are hard! I was able to win poker from time to time, and I made some money sticking with the safe bet at the horse races. But the zombie game? The computer would always pick them off while I couldn't even get started. I was not able to figure out the parser game. I don't know anything about football, so I didn't do too good there. And the Keno game didn't pay out very much when I played the 20-spot. I didn't come anywhere close on the slots, and even when I made it to the bonus game, I immediately matched two zeros. Also, I had a terrible flight home. I got sat next to this annoying guy who was going on about how he beat all the games and made a ton of money. Next year, I'm using my vacation time to visit Amsterdam.


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
A bunch of mini games wrapped up in Twine, October 5, 2021
by MathBrush
Related reviews: about 1 hour

This game is unapologetically just a bunch of mini games wrapped up in Twine with an ultrathin story applied.

The minigames include:

-A slot machine with fruit graphics and some animation
-A poker draw game
-Keno
-Horse Racing
-A football game
-A zombie-shooting card game
-A short custom-parser text adventure.

Each of the games worked pretty well, and some of them were pretty fun. All are based on RNG except the text adventure. The text adventure has a pretty basic parser (which has a tendency to insult you) and is of the classic 'my dead male relative's house' style, with each room lovingly recreated.

+Polish: Very smooth. The parser isn't awesome compared to dedicated parser languages but impressive for Twine
+Descriptiveness: It was easy to see what was going on usually
+Interactiviy: Most games worked well for me.
-Emotional impact: I felt distanced emotionally from my character and the games
-Would I play again? It was interesting, but I don't think I'll be revisiting.



1-4 of 4 | Return to game's main page