Lilac Song

Some knowledge of, or experience with, Autumn Chen's Social Democracy: An Alternate History is ideal for understanding this game. I've hung out in the fan-made Discord server a little, which isn't officially run by the dev although she's in it, and through this I've learned that there was originally a frame story planned for Social Democracy, where the protagonist would be playing as a trans woman in Weimar-era Germany who spends time working on a simulation of German politics and trying to imagine any plausible path forward for German democracy, any future where the Nazis don't take power and destroy everything. This frame story was dropped as the simulation itself expanded in scope, and expanded some more, and kept expanding until it swallowed up the fictional context and Social Democracy became a pure simulation of Weimar politics.

Lilac Song evidently brings the frame story back as its own mostly-independent project, no longer inextricably tied up with the weighty and ridiculously popular Social Democracy game. Well, ridiculously popular for a Spring Thing game, at least. It's been fascinating to see the game increase in popularity, and I also left the Discord server a long time ago when I deleted my account, in part because I got tired of the political debates people would have. I'm not one to discuss politics with other people online, and even seeing other people talk about it can be exhausting, especially when so much negativity is around these days, for highly understandable reasons. Yet no matter how many insults get slung around and how many endless circular arguments get reiterated again and again, it never seems to mean anything. Can disaffected people arguing online have any real impact? The gap between online and offline is unbridgeable, all the political opinions expressed online always seem empty on some level, frustrations from the powerless, pale imitations of actions that could be performed in the real world by political leadership to stem the seas of blood and yet nothing is happening.

There's a lot of this in this game: the protagonist is making her simulation, reading the news and studying history and economics and discussing politics with her employer, Prussian minister Otto Braun, who is much vaunted in the Social Democracy fan community for the many ways he can stop fascism in the simulation, even though he failed to stop fascism in real life.

The irony of a historical simulation is that the closer it approaches real life, the harder it becomes to change from real life, the harder it becomes to avoid what actually happened. Social Democracy is an extremely difficult game; my best attempts ended in civil war and my worst with Hitler in charge of the nation. Could the SPD have really succeeded? Was there ever a real path forward for them? The closer you approach reality, the harder it is to win.

"The game's models are imperfect, always approaching reality, never reaching it. So many improvements to make."

Lilac Song is about real life. No matter what happens in the simulation, how many alternate futures you try or fail to spin up, how deeply you investigate and reproduce the systems that led to the Nazis taking power, how much you try to change it, it's only a simulation in the end. Otto Braun refuses to listen to you. You have no actual power; all you can do is watch.

"Do you believe that a game could really save Germany? Or is this nothing more than an enjoyable diversion?"

One last note. The cover art, and some of the other art in the game, is by Paul Klee. He was targeted as a Jewish "degenerate artist" in Nazi Germany due to his avant-garde style, and had to flee to Switzerland where he died. He's known for being admired by Walter Benjamin, a German and Jewish philosopher who was also targeted by the Nazis. Benjamin was forced to flee Germany, but he left too late. When he learned he would not be allowed to cross the Franco-Spanish border as a refugee and would be forced to return to Nazi Germany, he killed himself.

I know this mainly because of a comedic internet post criticizing one of Paul Klee's drawings for its abstract, avant-garde style compared to Walter Benjamin's lofty description of it, which went viral and spread to several social platforms. The original poster was criticized for their criticism, because it replicated the same line of attack the Nazis used against Paul Klee's art. They proceeded to double down and use AI to generate what they thought was a better version, painted in a sweeping, dramatic, realistic style. Many angry commenters told the original poster to commit suicide.