Have you played this game?You can rate this game, record that you've played it, or put it on your wish list after you log in.
Playlists and Wishlists
RSS FeedsNew member reviews
Updates to external links
All updates to this page
About the Story
A theme park executive dies on a rollercoaster. Was it an accident? Was it foul play? Grab your crime fighting kit and gather your wits to investigate why all is not happy in Happyland.
24th Place - 26th Annual Interactive Fiction Competition (2020)
|Average Rating: |
Number of Reviews: 4
Write a review
Considering the importance of asking questions in an investigation like this, character responses are very brief and to the point, which makes for simpler deduction but takes away some of the immersion; you never get much of a deep understanding of the characters. The same goes for descriptions of rooms and objects. As a puzzle, it is quite simple and straightforward; visiting all the locations and talking to all the characters makes it obvious who the murderer is. Nothing is well hidden either, and there are no red herrings to speak of. In the end it took me less than an hour to complete. It was not particularly challenging, but rather enjoyable nonetheless.
(I beta tested this game)
A confession, dear reader: I am awful at IF mysteries. I like them in theory, and Iím pretty good at figuring things out when watching a murder mystery on TV. But put one in front of me in parser form and itís a bad scene Ė maybe itís because theyíre timer-dependent and I donít have the patience to take good notes, or that I usually have a hard time getting a handle on how NPC interaction is supposed to work, but every once in a while I decide to try one of the Infocom mysteries and get like five moves in before fleeing away in terror. I did once manage to hack my way through like a third of Make It Good before getting stuck and, upon checking the hints, discovered that actually all Iíd done was fallen for red herrings and Iíd actually been making negative progress.
Given all this, I was flat-out astonished that I was able to solve Happyland without any hints. I donít think itís because itís too simple or easy Ė nabbing the right culprit isnít excessively hard, true, but there are some sub-plots and side-areas of investigation that are pleasantly twisty, and I was able to unravel those after some careful experimentation too. Rather, itís because the game generally plays fair, uses a timer but has a generous hand both with the overall limit and the windows for specific events, and does a good job of providing clues and enabling you to work backward through an intimidatingly-large possibility space to suss out all the whys and wherefors.
Speaking of working backwards, I should probably back up and mention the setup. At first blush, itís a pretty standard cop-show premise, with your detective protagonist called in to investigate a death that may or may not be accidental (spoiler: it is not). I did experience a little bit of tonal disorientation on why a hotel is called ďHappylandĒ, and the idea of a regular hotel in the middle of a rural area developing an amusement-park add-on seemed a little odd to me, but itís easy enough to roll with: really, youíve got a body, half a dozen suspects, and a forensics kit, so itís all about diving into the details to try to solve the mystery.
That forensics kit does a lot of the heavy lifting Ė pretty much all the puzzles require using it to analyze fingerprints, assess trace chemicals, and magnify small discrepancies. The other half of the mystery-solving equation is interacting with the robust cast of characters, interrogating them and confronting them with various pieces of evidence. This is more complex business than the typical adventure-game TIE ROPE TO ROCK sort of thing, but the parser takes care of it quite well, with the only niggle a bit of wonkiness around disambiguation Ė especially notable given that this is a custom parser, which often have a negative reputation! But I didnít run into any guess-the-verb issues, and NPCs were usually smart enough to draw the appropriate conclusions based on what I was showing or telling them.
There are a few small things that could be cleaned-up for a post-Comp release Ė notably, in one playthrough, I was able to nab the suspect before a particular event happened, but the post-game newspaper story still referenced that event (Spoiler - click to show) (Iím talking about Cooperís death Ė I know the timing of his poisoning can shift depending on the playerís actions, but if youíve never seen him collapse itís odd to see it mentioned). But generally thereís a high degree of attention to detail, including probably my favorite Easter Egg of the Comp (Spoiler - click to show) (ANALYZE POEM). My only real complaint is that Happyland is lulling me into thinking Iím getting better at IF mysteries Ė so itíll be at fault when I take another run at Deadline, am promptly smacked back down, and once again write off the subgenre.
I beta tested this game.
This is another custom parser game, but this one is web-enabled, and features a complex realtime murder investigation in the vein of Deadline (which is cited as a direct inspiration).
Just like in Deadline, you have a large building full of independently moving people, time events that change everything, and the ability to analyse (although here we carry our own fingerprinting machine and chemical analyzer).
The parser is not bad for a custom parser; in fact, people's custom parser writing skills in general seem to be improving a lot from year to year. There are some niceties that need some improvement, though. For instance, the game tells you to sample things in the format 'SAMPLE __________', but if you try to sample the wrong things (like SAMPLE PANEL) it throws an error message as if SAMPLE wasn't recognized. Of course, I beta tested it so I should have found and reported that myself.
Deadline was the hardest of all the Infocom games for me to play, and I ran to the hints quickly. This game is also hard, but plays by the same rules as Deadline. Without any hints, I expect this game to take several hours. The mystery is quite elaborate; I only ever found the most obvious suspect, but I'm interested in still looking for the truth.
If you liked Infocom's mysteries, you'll definitely like this, and it's a worthy successor to them.
-Polish: As indicated above, the custom parser could use a little tuning up.
-Descriptivenss: The descriptions are generally small and bare.
+Interactivity: The mechanics are ingenious and the puzzle is clever.
+Emotional impact: I found this game intriguing.
+Would I play again? One day I plan on revisiting this game.
Very Old Dog, by Tony Delgado
Average member rating: (3 ratings)
Doomsday, by Admiral Jota
Average member rating: (3 ratings)
In this game, you play as Agent Seafoam, a secret agent from the future. Disguised as a Taco Bell janitor, you have traveled to 1999 to prevent Agent Blue from delivering the plans to the Doomsday Machine which will destroy North Dakota.
|Will Not Let Me Go, by Stephen Granade|
Average member rating: (53 ratings)
Dallas, Texas. 1996. Fred Strickland has Alzheimer's.
I'm looking for mysteries. by MCCLUTCH32
I like a game with a good story, good puzzles that aren't too difficult to understand and a good mystery. I was thinking more along the lines of horror, but murder mysteries work as well.