5 star: | | (1) | 4 star: | | (3) | 3 star: | | (4) | 2 star: | | (1) | 1 star: | | (0) |
| Average Rating: ![3½ Stars](/img/blank.gif) Number of Ratings: 9 Write a review |
1-9 of 9
- Zape, December 8, 2020
- MarshHopper, July 19, 2020
- Edo, July 19, 2020
- Simon Deimel (Germany), December 27, 2015
- EllaClass, November 16, 2014
- Indigo9182, July 1, 2014
5 of
5 people found the following review helpful:
Good short IF, June 21, 2013Play it if: you don't bear a grudge against Speed IF entries, because while this is extremely limited in scope it does have a fun quirk to make it a decent waste of three minutes.
Don't play it if: you bear a grudge against Speed IF entries, because while this does have a fun quirk to make it a decent waste of three minutes, it is extremely limited in scope.
Speed IF reminds me a lot of improv comedy: it's quick and scrappy, and easier to enjoy when you're in a certain frame of mind. It's a less concentrated experience than what you get with longer, planned stuff, but occasionally it's spontaneous enough to give you a few powerful moments of experience.
Things won't change your mind, but its central notable feature is a gratifyingly subversive take on "opaque narration" games like The Gostak and For A Change. I feel fairly certain that it would have gotten tiresome in a longer game, but as Speed IF it's a quick enough experience to preserve the novelty - making Things an appropriate use of the genre's creative limitations.
- MonochromeMolly, November 22, 2011
- Otto (France), January 11, 2009
1-9 of 9 | Return to game's main page