The End Means Escape

by Steve Kodat


Return to the game's main page

Reviews and Ratings

5 star:
4 star:
3 star:
2 star:
1 star:
Average Rating:
Number of Ratings: 7
Write a review

1-11 of 11


The end justifies the means? In this game, they rarely seem remotely connected.
-- Adam Cadre

You wrote this review - Revise it | Direct link | Add a comment


I'm fascinated by word puzzles. I was particularly fascinated by the one in part two of this game, where your inventory contains a certain number of words, the room contains a certain number of words, and you have to manipulate them in various ways to make certain phrases.
-- Tina Sikorski

You wrote this review - Revise it | Direct link | Add a comment

>INVENTORY - Paul O'Brian writes about interactive fiction

So yes, the game is flawed, and it's also rather inaccessible, but it's still a stimulating experiment in avant-garde IF. It was nothing like any piece of IF I'd ever seen, and that's what I liked about it.

You wrote this review - Revise it | Direct link | Add a comment

- thecanvasrose, August 21, 2019

- Cory Roush (Ohio), August 1, 2017

- branewurms, June 28, 2016

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
Utterly bizarre surreal game with word manipulation and talking items, February 3, 2016

This is one of the weirdest games I have yet played. You are thrust into a room where every single object speaks. After talking to them, you are placed in a puzzle where you can physically manipulate the words in the room description. After that, you enter a bizarre world with doll-like humans you can move around, undress, and interact with. Then a bizarre maze, and finally a nonsensical last world with bizarre symbology.

I honestly have no idea what was going on here, but the puzzles are more or less pretty fun.

Recommended for fans of the bizarre and weird.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

- Adam Biltcliffe (Cambridge, UK), May 10, 2015

- Relle Veyér, March 1, 2012

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
Compelling puzzles in completely disjointed scenes, March 31, 2010
by Danielle (The Wild West)

This is a hard one for me to rate, because in some areas it really excels, while in other areas it falls flat.

For instance, its opening scene, with the varying personalities you encounter and the unique way you get information about the room drew me in quickly. Immediately afterwards, there was a puzzle that made zero sense to me. The hints only helped to a point, but the puzzle needed more context.

After that, the scene turns creepy and isolated in a way I don't see too often in IF. Loved that. But the puzzle itself turned into a frustrating experiment in reading the author's mind. Boo. (At least the built-in-hints helped.) Then a maze with a clever solution that I enjoyed puzzling out.

The final scene had an interesting puzzle and setting, but I had zero idea who I was. What was I now? What had I been in the first scene? Why do I care? Why did the maze lead to this?

Great puzzles and moody sets are all fine and good, but if they're going to be so disjointed in theme, the character (or something! anything!) should be a unifying, overarching thread so it doesn't feel like a cafeteria lady serving up IF puzzles wearing a Halloween mask to be mysterious.

I played this right after finishing An Open Field. Here's my conclusion: those two games should've traded some ideas. OPEN FIELD, while initially disorienting, ends with a clear background concept; by the end, you knew who you were, what your situation was, and what your goal would be as that character. However, OPEN FIELD lacked implementation that would've made it a standout work.

THE END MEANS has implementation up the ying-yang. (Just "x young" in the second scene of THE END'll understand.)

If you like puzzles, try out THE END MEANS ESCAPE. If you're looking for more story to go with your IF, you may want to sit this one out.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

Baf's Guide

Abstract and surreal little game. The first scenario--in which you interact with a variety of inanimate objects, most of which have complex relationships with each other and highly distinct personalities--works very well; the implementation is thorough and the whole thing is imaginatively done. After that, things tail off a bit--the puzzles get rather obscure and the implementation becomes rather slipshod in parts. Still, the first scene alone makes this one worth trying.

-- Duncan Stevens

You wrote this review - Revise it | Direct link | Add a comment

1-11 of 11 | Return to game's main page