Go to the game's main page
Review
0 of
9 people found the following review helpful:
by tadsPro (Oklahoma)
A good thought game but does not focus on the audience. The game is heavy in the sense that it has more lines of code. The puzzles are to hard to solve but still it is a good idea to review this game for learning TADS language.
I think i wont solve this game for now but i may continue to play it later on.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Remove vote | Add a comment
Comments on this review
Previous | << 1 >> | Next
Canalboy, October 25, 2024 - Reply
The game claims to have had multiple beta testers. One wonders what it was like previously as I counted four typographical howlers on the opening page, including "sandwitch" for "sandwich" which must be spelled incorrectly to be taken. Even the score update template is misspelled (***your score just cahanged (sic) by 5 points***).
I have hammered this point home so many times. Why spend ages coding a game and not take a few minutes to spell check it at the end? Why claim to be a beta tester when you quite clearly aren't?
Previous | << 1 >> | NextThe game claims to have had multiple beta testers. One wonders what it was like previously as I counted four typographical howlers on the opening page, including "sandwitch" for "sandwich" which must be spelled incorrectly to be taken. Even the score update template is misspelled (***your score just cahanged (sic) by 5 points***).
I have hammered this point home so many times. Why spend ages coding a game and not take a few minutes to spell check it at the end? Why claim to be a beta tester when you quite clearly aren't?
IFDB Home |
Contact Us |
Code of Conduct |
Terms of Service |
Privacy |
Copyrights & Trademarks |
API
IFDB is managed by the Interactive Fiction Technology Foundation.
It is funded by the donations of IF supporters like you.
All donations go to support the operation of this web site and IFTF's other services.