by Neil deMause


Go to the game's main page

Member Reviews

Number of Reviews: 5
Write a review

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
An historical curiosity for the historically curious., December 27, 2012

Baf's guide says this piece "has been called an anti-game." I'm willing to bet it's been called a lot worse.

With thorough exploration, when armed with some knowledge of IF programming and history, this work can be appreciated for some of the nuances of coding and genre that it subverts. However, it is entirely unsatisfying from a narrative perspective, offering only a raw "puzzle" (technically a riddle, wrapped in mystery, inside an enigma) that is disconnected from the story's ostensible premise and any conceivable player motivation other than sheer will-to-complete.

It's really too bad. The seed idea (allegedly: trying to complete an adventure game that has become corrupted and no longer functions correctly) is the kind of scenario that might have actually happened in the nostalgic era of oft-pirated 5 1/4" floppies. It seems like it would be possible to build a surrealist story with clever puzzles on this foundation, and, based on his later work with the Frenetic Five series, I am certain Mr. DeMause had the creativity to do so.

Although I did not like this particular example of the author's handiwork, it is competently put together, and some small part of me does appreciate it how it can be appreciated. As such, I am compelled to give it two stars, though I recommend avoiding it unless you are interested in its historical value as an entry in the very first IF Comp.

Comments on this review

Previous | << 1 >> | Next

Andrew Schultz, December 27, 2012 - Reply
Your review has made me curious about this game. The author's other works seem interesting, too, now that I look at them. Even if it's objectively bad, it seems like it's my sort of bad.
Previous | << 1 >> | Next