External Links

There are no known download links for this game.

Have you played this game?

You can rate this game, record that you've played it, or put it on your wish list after you log in.

Playlists and Wishlists

RSS Feeds

New member reviews
Updates to external links
All updates to this page

Lantern

by Sylfir

2022

Web Site

No reviews yet - be the first

About the Story

A short mystery/horror story about a blind man that holds lighted lantern, but he can not see anything. Can he use his other senses to get out of the place?

To navigate though the game you can use actions commands like this:
examine item
examine verb noun or only examine noun
give item toSomeone

for senses in room
- touch around
- search around
- smell around
- listen around
- look around
- talk around

for senses on item
- taste item
- smell item
- touch item
- listen item

basic item commands
- examine item
- give item object
- open object
- close object
- empty item
- repair (or fix) object
- search item
- shine item object
- look item


Game Details


Awards

Entrant? - ParserComp 2022

Tags

- View the most common tags (What's a tag?)

(Log in to add your own tags)
Tags you added are shown below with checkmarks. To remove one of your tags, simply un-check it.

Enter new tags here (use commas to separate tags):

Member Reviews

Number of Reviews: 1
Write a review


6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
Lost and gone forever?, August 8, 2022
by Mike Russo (Los Angeles)
Related reviews: ParserComp 2022

A couple days ago as of this writing, Sylfirís games vanished from itch, without so far as I know any explanation. Iíve seen speculation that this was an attempt to withdraw Lantern from ParserComp, which I suppose is plausible though in that case Iím not sure why they got rid of all their other games, as well as their account information, too. Given the gameís current unavailability, and the uncertainty about why that is and whether it will ever be available again, itís perhaps inappropriate to write anything about it. But as I said in another thread, if we listened to Virgil the Aeneid would have been destroyed in antiquity, and despite Kafkaís posthumous autographopyromanic wishes the consensus is in favor of reading and engaging with his previously-unpublished stuff. Those are maybe too-exalted reference points, but Kafka at least didnít have much of a predecease reputation; it mostly came later, based on the work. Anyway to square the circle, I resolved the check out the game, but only review it if I had positive things to say.

Given that youíre reading this, of course, itís clear that I did. Lantern is a bit rough, and I must confess I played it almost entirely with the trackpad rather than using its parser, but itís creative and has some charm. Itís part of the escape-the-room (well, three rooms) mini-genre, with the uncharacterized player character dropped into locked oubliette without explanation and forced to rely on their wits to solve a series of contrived puzzles and break free. To be clear, Iím not harping on the lack of plot or realism as flaws: theyíre part of what I expect from this kind of game, and their presence helps to set player expectations accordingly. What departs from the standards of the genre, though, is that while you start out unable to see anything, that isnít a barrier thatís quickly vanquished by the titular bringer of light: no, youíve somehow been deprived of your sight, so you need to navigate your way through these brainteasers with your other senses.

This is a conceit thatís actually ideally suited for IF, I think, since depriving the player of sight in a graphics-based game would be perverse and probably lead to significant interface issues. Here, though, itís just a matter of changing how the world is described to the player, forcing them to feel around rooms to find out whatís there, listen for movement, and lick and smell to identify objects. The author doesnít make this too taxing a process Ė and in fact does a nice job of updating the names of objects as you investigate them with your different senses and figure out what they are Ė but itís an effective gimmick that works well with the obsessive investigation escape-the-room games typically require.

While the concept works, there are some foibles in implementation. Most obviously, there are a host of typos littering pretty much every description of a room or object, which is fairly distracting, and there are a couple of bugs (one itemís name appears to incorporate fragments of code, and I was able to simply reach through a locked closet without first finding the key). The interface can also be frustrating if you go into Lantern expecting to type your way through it. The game engine appears to be primarily choice-based, with descriptions highlighting certain clickable keywords and ending with a likewise-clickable inventory list that includes your sense organs (you can click an item once to select it, then click it on another to combine them or use a sense; double-clicking does a closer inspection of the thing). The game allows you to type commands as an alternative to using the links, but this implementation means, however, that if youíre examining an object the keywords for the other objects in a room, or those denoting your inventory and senses, usually arenít displayed. This means that typing TOUCH TABLE, then TOUCH PAPER might fail, whereas the commands would work fine if you tried them in the opposite order. I can see this being hideously frustrating, but I switched to playing exclusively via clicking very early, and found the interface worked just fine that way.

Clicking also makes it easy to exhaust all the different action combinations, which I had to do a couple of times. Thereís at least one puzzle here that defies all logic and I canít imagine a player solving it except by lawnmowering through the possibilities on offer (Spoiler - click to show) (using the knife on the scratches reading HELL to change it to HELLO, which summons another character to a different room). But again, I kind of expect that from these kinds of games, and the number of potential actions is sufficiently low that itís not too onerous to power through.

So weíve got a puzzle game with a fun gimmick, many rough edges, not much plot to speak of, and an interface that can feel like rubbing your face against a cheese grater if you try to play the game the way its entry in something called ParserComp seems to imply you should. I whiled away a pleasant enough half an hour on it, but I canít say it moved me or made me laugh or clap with delight at its cleverness. So I suppose by some standard itís no big deal that itís not online anymore, and wouldnít even be a big deal if it vanished completely with nobody ever the wiser. Iím not sure I can muster a rigorous rebuttal against that argument, but it still makes me kind of sad Ė and if thatís where the standard is set, I think a lot more of us than just Sylfir are in trouble. 98% of pretty much everything pretty much every one of us does is imperfect, compromised, wouldnít stand up to even the flimsiest scrutiny Ė and oblivion is the destination itís all hurtling towards. Call me sentimental, but Iím not inclined to hurry the process along.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 




This is version 1 of this page, edited by MathBrush on 1 July 2022 at 7:38pm. - View Update History - Edit This Page - Add a News Item - Delete This Page