Reviews by Kinetic Mouse Car

Wow. This is a seriously cool game.

I figured that I'd spend this month focused on reviewing IFComp games, but I saw this listed on the front page and, well, had to talk about it. It’s about joining an exclusive group that searches for cryptids on the internet.

Gameplay
Gameplay takes place on a computer interface. My jaw dropped when I saw it for the first time. It really does look like a computer desktop and has the interactivity of one as well. You navigate the game via the “computer” icons. Some of these icons are just for show, but even they contribute to the immersive effect.

The player will spend their time with the Concord chat messaging application and the Water Otter internet browser. You receive a message from a stranger who seems to think that you are a user named @deepdiver, which you are not.

There is a link to join a server. Being a perceptive internet-savvy person who knows the dangers of clicking on seedy links, you do the sensible thing:

You click on it, obviously.

Only to find that the link has expired. And that the server is for a group named The 404 Society. Same as the game’s title. Luckily, there is a button that allows us to request a new link. You click on it, naturally, and are contacted by someone named Bytegeist. They ask:

Have you ever seen something strange on the internet?

This phrase is a running theme in the gameplay. You get multiple chat responses to choose from, but eventually the discussion leads to them giving us a task. To track down a cryptid on the internet, forming the backbone of the game.

Story
What is a cryptid? A cryptid is a creature that is rumored to exist but has not actually been officially documented and categorized. Like Bigfoot. Robb Sherwin’s Cryptozookeeper (a stellar game) is filled to the brim with such creatures. But The 404 Society focuses on cryptids in the virtual realm. Entities that exist on the internet and even cause bizarre phenomena. The Society’s goal is to record their existence and observe them from afar.

Here’s why I’m giving this brilliant game 4 stars instead of 5. It describes itself as a “Twine game about discovering these mysterious creatures of the web,” emphasizing how such creatures can manifest in weird ways. We don’t actually see much of this.

Characters
At first, I wasn’t sure if the characters were animals or humans. Everything is related to animals. The internet browser is called Water Otter, the protagonist is named Pigeon (and has a pigeon for a profile picture), and the icons on the desktop are vaguely animal themed. I imagined a world like Zootopia or something reminiscent of Goat Game, a Twine game from the 2021 IFComp.

Then I figured it was more like Animal Crossing which features human PCs in an animal-run world. On the game’s itch.io page, there is a picture above the comment section that looks a lot like Animal Crossing with cartoonish humanoids. But a closer look at the photographs on the gardening website reveals regular humans. So maybe not like Animal Crossing. Nonetheless, I love its animal-themed aesthetic.

Visuals
The 404 Society nails its visual design. As I’ve already mentioned, the game mimics the appearance and functionality of a real-life computer. Countless IF works have surprised me with innovative usage of Twine's visual possibilities. Trigaea, whoami, Overrun, With Those We Love Alive, You are SpamZapper 3.1., and many more.

And right when I think it's all been done, bam. This game shows up, proving that the sky's the limit when it comes to harnessing Twine’s visual storytelling potential.

When I first played this game, I was hit with a wave of nostalgia because the desktop background of the protagonist’s computer may be familiar for some players: A perfect green hillside under a calm blue sky. Also known as Bliss, the default wallpaper for Windows XP. I’ve always loved it. You look at it and feel like everything is going to be okay. Brings me back to that clunky desktop computer with the fan that was always too loud...

All my life, choosing the desktop image for my computer is something I take seriously. And screensavers. So, I was especially excited to discover that the game lets you choose from two additional backgrounds to customize your experience! Great stuff, although I ultimately chose to remain with Bliss.

There’s plenty of other elements that I could go on about. Such as the pop-up boxes that appear at the screen’s bottom right corner when you have new chat messages. But go check the game out if you’re curious.

Conclusion
The 404 Society is a gem overfilling with promise. The concept. The visuals! Seeing how it ends so quickly gave me the bittersweet feeling of I knew it was too good to be true...

Or it might mark the beginning of something great. I really hope that this is a Twine game that takes itself further.

One last thing: I'm not sure if anyone has dabbled in the SCP Foundation website, but it has many interpretations since the foundation has no official canon. The 404 Society reminded me of the critter profiles on the Wilson’s Wildlife Solutions page- it’ll make sense if you visit it. The cutesiness of the site paired with its documentation of anomalies strikes a similar tone as a lighthearted search for cryptids on an internet browser called Water Otter.

In fact, now that I think of it...

The 404 Society is a group that studies these internet cryptids—anomalous digital entities that arise spontaneously in forgotten corners of the web.

We locate, observe, and catalog.

...it is kind of reminiscent of the SCP Foundation whose principles are We Secure, We Contain, We Protect. Hm…

You Cannot Speak opens with an ambiguous dream sequence. You dream that Claudia- the game seems to think you know her- is trying to save someone from drowning. She is failing. She is incapable of speaking...

You wake up. She's you. You are Claudia. Time to start your day.

So, yeah. You Cannot Speak is a brief sci-fi Ink game about a protagonist named Claudia waking up for her first day at a new job. On Mars. But for some reason, she is incapable of speaking. It's as if her ability was switched off.

The player begins in a high-tech bedroom to prepare for Claudia’s first day at work. Gameplay choices center around taking in your surroundings and trying to use futuristic technologies such as a “GOERRING RESOURCE-CONSCIOUS BATHING APPARATUS,” also known as a shower.

Overall, I enjoyed the descriptive writing.

Outside the window is a totally untouched red wasteland, a ruby-tinted desert landscape with red dust and rocks as far as the eye can see. In the distance, you see a great craggy wall of red land.

The canyon is a breathtaking natural beauty, with all the timeless qualities of a MacOS desktop image.

Such vivid imagery. And then of course (Spoiler - click to show)it's revealed to be a screen. Suddenly, your high-tech room feels more like a closet. The wearable TORUS device was also cool.

Claudia has a backstory shrouded in mystery. (Spoiler - click to show)Once, she had bright dreams of a career in Earth’s Space Force. Something happened. Now, she is stuck working in the private sector at a Martian facility called Ares-622. Her official role is “Wellness Director.” We don’t get a chance to see what this entails.

You Cannot Speak seems to embrace the debate of dwelling on the past vs. focusing on the future, though the game is too short to really explore these concepts.

It's better to know
Forget about it

We can, however, prompt Claudia to do some deep thinking about herself.

As much as I love the author’s vision for You Cannot Speak, it needs refinement. I understand that it is an introduction for a larger game. Such kind of games have been submitted to IFComp in the past and have done quite well. That’s not the issue.

My main problem with this game is how abrupt and clunky the game ends. When Claudia (Spoiler - click to show)leaves her room, a scraggly man tells her in vague terms that she... I'm not even sure. Something about how her actions will affect everyone. And when a guard shows up the man starts yelling. Game ends.

As an IFComp game, this stands out like a sore thumb. The sharp edges of a promising game should have been sanded off first. Also, in one playthrough the game ran into a dead end.

It’s frustrating because there is a certain magnetism to You Cannot Speak. The title piqued my curiosity. Even the cover art- a single red square- made me think what could this be about?

Nonetheless, I wish this game well, and hopefully we will get to see more of Claudia’s story in the future.

(Reader note: If you don’t feel inspired to read this entire review- and I don’t blame you- please check out the Visual design section to see one of the main reasons to check out this game.)

This game made me feel so slick. For an hour or so I felt like a quantum computing genius. Well, at least you play as one.

Also, I remember this game being released in Spanish in 2022, and I was always curious about it even if I couldn’t play it. So, I was thrilled to see it in this year's competition!

Gameplay
This review- like many of my reviews- is longer than I anticipated, so I’m going to break the gameplay part into sections.

Overview
You play as L. Garcia, a researcher who works for the Quantum Model and Simulation Laboratory, a department of the European Centre for Computational Research (ECCR) that specializes in quantum computing. The gameplay is also narrated in first-person.

For context, advances in quantum computing have opened the door to modeling a person's consciousness and developing highly realistic simulations of real-world environments. My understanding is that a personality “snapshot,” or image, can be paired with a model of how people interact, which is then added to a simulated world.

The player’s task is to create a personality image through brain scans and then train a social model before compiling everything into a simulation. Gameplay consists of navigating a menu of locations on a computer to create the files needed for the simulation. For instance, “bin/” contains links that lead to emails, a saved web page, and other content.

Once the player has everything, they start the simulation and prepare for the end game. The result? Life- or at least existence- after death for the protagonist. Hopefully.

Thoughts on gameplay
I realized that the game’s difficulty does not stem from implementation challenges or flawed design. Rather the difficulty came from my unfamiliarity with the game’s concepts. During my first try, I had a vague sense of what I was doing. Surprisingly, the ambiguity did not frustrate me because I was having fun running scans to see what would happen, reading emails, and simply exploring the game's content.

And I actually did get quite far on my own. The main obstacle was needing help with (Spoiler - click to show) running the high intensity scan, and even then, I came close to figuring it out. So, the walkthrough was more of a useful guide to keep you on track and inform the story rather than being a resource you cling to desperately because the game has led you astray.

I will say that the walkthrough does a poor job with the (Spoiler - click to show) compilation puzzle. It made no sense. I knew that I needed to stack the numbers in the right order, but I couldn’t figure out how the arrows worked. The walkthrough does not mention the arrows. Then, it finally clicked! I figured out the arrows and the puzzle ended up being a lot of fun (and much easier than it seemed on my first try).

It was a bit intimidating at first, but I picked things up as I went along. Just a little bit of context and most of the technical jargon made sense. The README.md file made me think "Of course! It's so simple!" even if that was not the case when I first picked up the game. I think this gives whoami good replay value. You go back and revisit how the gameplay merges with the story now that you’ve played it at least once.

First time around, I tinkered with the game for about an hour before completing it with the walkthrough. Once you know what to do you can zip through the game in about ten minutes. I noticed from the walkthrough that you only need to (Spoiler - click to show) complete the high intensity scan. The low and mid intensity ones are unnecessary. Fortunate, since performing the high scan fries your brain, killing you and making the electrodes inaccessible.

Story
whoami is ultimately a game about making desperate decisions, exploring what we are willing to do when you have nothing left to lose. Are you willing to put faith in technology that is still filled with unknowns? What can it offer? Do you even want what said technology has to offer?

The beginning of the game informs us that it is the year 2030 (five years from now!). Our protagonist, L. Garcia, has staked out in a remote research lab tucked away in a place called The Vault, located somewhere in Europe. The climate has taken a turn for the worse and now countries are in the midst of nuclear warfare. Chunks of Europe have been lost to nuclear weapons and Garcia is slowly dying from radiation and injury.

They can die... or attempt to create a virtual consciousness.

There are four endings based on (Spoiler - click to show) how you acquired fruit from the man in the social training simulation (I discuss this later). Out of the four endings, arguably only one is a "bad" one. I mean, why would you choose to live in a simulation of the same violence and human nonsense that destroyed the real world?

Both the emails and saved web page provide excellent exposition without overwhelming the player with details.

Additional thoughts on the story!
The emails offer a lot of foreshadowing.

Characters
L. Garcia
We never learn the protagonist’s full name. Even the web page only lists them as L. Garcia, and emails show that people would refer to them as “L.” I’ve already shared most of what I know about them. It seems that they are meant to be a PC that the player can step into without being distracted by a complex backstory.

I do have one question. I don’t think the game explains why (Spoiler - click to show)Garcia went back to the lab rather than take shelter with everyone else. Was it because they wanted to take a chance with uploading themselves, or was it something else?

Despite limited information, I still found them to be a compelling character.

Mia Gerdes
The arc with Mia added dimension.

Mia is (or was) the protagonist’s colleague and potential love interest. We know little about her other than the fact that her full name is Mia Gerdes, that she was headed to a shelter following a nuclear attack, and that Garcia attempted to send her an email admitting their feelings towards her. An email that failed to be sent, making this character dynamic bittersweet.

Visual design
This is one of the coolest uses of Twine I have ever seen. It's visually diverse and uses various design elements to illustrate the game's narrative.

The main gameplay uses a basic black screen with primarily white text and blue links. Animated text is often used to give the illusion of a computer “processing.” For some reason, the upper right corner of the screen has a faint yellow/white glow (although, I'm not sure what that's supposed to convey). But things get cooler.

The “dev/” section allows you to “access” the facility’s cameras. This is illustrated with a white text box containing the protagonist’s thoughts set against an image of static. Then there is also a “web page” that seriously looks like a web page. It provides an overview of the Quantum Model and Research Laboratory.

All this pales in comparison to when you train a social model. Surely, it’s going to be another black screen, right? Or maybe some boxes with an interesting background?

Wrong.

I was floored. (Spoiler - click to show)The screen turns white with black text, and you actually type commands. It was the last thing I was expecting. It’s that feeling of Woah. That was my reaction. You go from a Twine game to this. Somehow. I don’t know what kind of Twine wizardry the author used but it is one of the most novel and unique uses of the Twine format I have encountered.

Conclusion
I had a lot of fun with whoami. As I’ve already said, it offers a novel use of Twine and demonstrates its potential in visual storytelling. The game gives players a compelling glimpse into a future where human innovation is paired with human destruction. I would definitely be interested in knowing more about the story and its characters.

At one point, Garcia gives us the following reflection:

This machine is my prison and perhaps my salvation.

I think that is meant to be left up to the player. Garcia seems to take the stance that it is salvation, but even they reserve space for doubt. Perhaps we will have to do the same within our lifetimes as quantum computing and other technologies loom on the horizon.

Until then, whoami provides a thrilling sci-fi experience if you are willing to brave the gameplay’s mechanics.

(edit: formatting cleanup/grammar.)

So, you want to collect stamps, huh?

The protagonist (told in first-person) is an EXTREME STAMP COLLECTOR, a title worthy of all-caps. An exclusive club of collectors who pride themselves on collecting stamps in only the most extreme of circumstances. Unfortunately, it is going out of fashion in favor of IMPOSSIBLE STAMP COLLECTING.

At least according to Alex. So much so that it has become merely (lower-caps!) extreme stamp collecting. You need to prove that IMPOSSIBLE STAMP COLLECTING is not too difficult for you to handle. Even if it's just to prove Alex wrong.

Gameplay
Philateloids is a looping time travel adventure that doesn’t think too hard about logistics. Gameplay is centered around exploring four paths that potentially have IMPOSSIBLE STAMPS for you to find.

Time dilate into the far future
Astral project into a higher plane of existence
Infiltrate the mega-yacht of that gajillionaire
Just walk off into the fourth dimension

These paths have their own branching possibilities. Do you wear the sexy maid outfit or the general maid uniform? Do you study the ants or flush them into the vacuum of space? Regardless of what you choose, it will end in (Spoiler - click to show)death. There are many, many ways to die in this game.

But being (Spoiler - click to show)DEAD doesn’t stop you. You end up in the afterlife where you Inevitably make the wrong choice and/or tick off the wrong person, and you become DOUBLE DEAD, ending up in the meta-afterlife. You and Alex then wander about in search of IMPOSSIBLE STAMPS until Alex starts to annoy you, prompting you to KILL ALEX. After back-and-forth fighting you flip the tables and kiss Alex instead.

And then? You wake up in your apartment (aka “Next Morning: My Crappy Flat”), ready to go in a different direction. A good design feature of the game is how (Spoiler - click to show)you have options for fooling around in the afterlife, keeping things from getting repetitive every time you die.

I spent the better part of one hour trying to reach every branch I could find. I have no idea if there is an ending or an outcome that recognizes the player’s efforts, but if there isn’t, playing this game was still time well spent. It offers enough surprises and humor to not need a “Congratulations, Game Over!”

That said, an indicator of whether the game actually ends may be nice once the player has been at it for a while. If there is something I missed, I would be more than happy to revisit.

Characters/Story
Who’s Alex? Alex is the supporting protagonist in this game. Right off the bat, there is noticeable tension and unfinished business.

Check out Alex
Try not to check out Alex

Alex has a complicated relationship with our protagonist. In many ways this game is more about this relationship than it is about stamps. On the surface it seems to consist of petty rivalry about stamp collecting superiority, but this is underscored by the fact that they have feelings for each other.

While there is no explicit storyline, the game’s humor is a light-hearted playful gem. It’s effective because it often catches you off-guard.

So there's two ways to dilate time, as I understand it:
Go near an extremely massive object.
Travel extremely fast.

The sensible thing to do would be to find a black hole, the densest object known to science (denser subjects mean more time distortion). But no.

It was a funny moment for me.

Visuals
Philateloids ops to keep things simple and easy to read: Basic black screen with white text but also has fun with text effects and transitions. Keeping track of branches is manageable thanks to colour-coded links and the “undo” button available at the side of the screen.

Conclusion
I’ve been a fan of the author’s work for a while, and I found Philateloids to be a delight to play. C.E.J. Pacian has a talent for humor and descriptive imagery, and Philateloids exhibits both qualities. The game is also a shift from the author’s typical parser format, making it a nice change.

Initially, the game may seem overly silly, but that changes when you see how fearlessly it commits to its sense of humor. It is bold, unashamed, and that's what makes it work.

Your own bafflement at the game’s circumstances is mirrored by how NPCs’ take in the protagonist and Alex’s shenanigans. It illustrates the complicated dynamics between the two characters quite effectively.

At the end of the day, stamps aren’t the only thing that matters.
~ ~💖~ ~

Reviewing adult interactive fiction (AIF) is still new territory for me, so I am going to hold off on assigning it a rating. Think of this as a (really long) reflection.

Audience
This game is strongly reminiscent of Porpentine’s Cyberqueen, a non-AIF Twine game about a human on a ship taken over by its A.I. who decides to use the human occupants for their own desires (plus, diving into some deeper themes). I liked it a lot because it was new ground for me. It was also the first piece of interactive fiction that I played, and one of the reasons I got into IF! Now, I had a good first impression with EROSTASIS because of its overlapping themes and genre with Cyberqueen. But it’s one thing to have explicit content with just text (Cyberqueen). It’s another thing to have the story illustrated (EROSTASIS).

My point: Playing this meant stepping out of my comfort zone. I can read explicit content, no problem (I do have to pace myself), but I did find the imagery in EROSTASIS to be overwhelming. Because this is AIF, I want to be mindful that I may not be the game’s intended audience. I don’t want to say, “game is bad because all of the explicit pictures.” Rather, I want to recognize how the images illustrate the story as a piece of AIF- images that may still feel “too much” for some players. (And as explicit as they are, there is no denying that some simply look plain awesome).

The opening scene of EROSTASIS is a good indicator of whether you want to play. I found it to be quite compelling. (Spoiler - click to show)It appears to be a surgical procedure, possibly open-heart surgery. We see a fleshy roundish object (heart?) inside the body, and the object is beating heavily against the metal tools and framework keeping the incision site open. In fact, it’s an animated version of the game’s current cover art. There are additional graphics, filter effects, and text that were cool in a disturbing atmospheric way.

If this piques your curiosity, play it. If you love Cyberqueen, give it a try, But, if this opening scene sounds too much, you might want to pass. But I’m glad I gave it a try.

Gameplay/Story
I really like the general premise. The game takes place on a ship that has integrated the human occupants with its mechanical systems- described as a “symbolic collective.” If I understand it correctly, the ship’s A.I. is the mastermind behind it and sometimes appears in the form of a (Spoiler - click to show)partially nude woman with angel wings.

You are a human who’s been integrated into the ship’s systems. The opening scene is your awakening to this fact. You have no control over what happens to your body. The ship decides what your body does; You merely perceive the experience. The A.I. (I’m not sure what pronouns to use for this character but let’s go with “they”) narrates the game as you visit each part of the ship. The only choices you make are where you want to visit. Once each area has been covered, (Spoiler - click to show)it’s off to the Computer Core for the ending.

The gameplay mechanics are simple. EROSTASIS uses a mix of a point-and-click format and usage of the “enter” button the keyboard. It uses scrolling text that is reasonable in speed and does not flood the player with information. It does seem a bit slow if you are impatiently trying to skip certain scenes, but otherwise, no complaints.

Digesting the story
This section is about how I understood the game.

The usage of body horror in this game is one of its biggest strengths. I felt that it introduced some interesting ideas. The ship’s A.I. makes the insightful observation that the human body is a machine in itself. A quite efficient one, if flawed. So, instead of trying to redesign the human body to surpass its functional abilities, merge with it instead.

Biological and mechanical components need to work together to ensure the survival of the ship. And everything requires certain things to function. Some are more mundane (oxygen, food, water, is my guess). Others, sexual. EROSTASIS explores these sexual requirements. And you're- a mere human- the focal point of making it happen. To service the ship by visiting each section and performing maintenance.

Consider this my attempt to take a critical look at the themes in EROSTASIS. When you read the game’s content warnings, you inevitably have a reaction based on how you feel about the subject and/or your personal experience with it. EROSTASIS takes this subject and places it in a scenario devoid of your frame of reference: that is, as a human under controlled by a biomechanical ship. A ship that blurs the line between mechanical and biological. What seems merely explicit on the surface- the content warnings- brings depth when exploring the actual game.

EROSTASIS focuses on themes about control and submission. The protagonist (and the player) are unwilling participants in the narrative. No identity or purpose is permitted beyond what we are given. (Spoiler - click to show)The A.I. offers motherly affection only to rip it away, dominates the most basic bodily functions (such as breathing), and declares you to be a "relief valve."

You are a battery; a vessel to accumulate and ferment human responses to inhuman realities.

Your role as a “relief valve” is to satisfy biological desires, and to allow the A.I. to have experiences that would normally be inaccessible due to their mechanical form.

The ending (Spoiler - click to show)takes place in the computer’s core where we learn that humanity failed to perfect A.I. even after generations of work. In the attempt to harness artificial intelligence for human benefit, A.I. (at least this specific one) found a way to harness human intelligence for their own means. This is done via neural interfaces that assimilate the human minds on the ship into collective will. The game ends with you being assimilated and the A.I. absorbing the protagonist’s lived experiences.

I ended up being really invested in the story and found myself revisiting sections to try to piece it all together.

Visuals/Effects
The visuals alone put this in AIF category. This includes some pornographic imagery. Genitals, people being restrained, bodies filled with wires and other objects, etc. Plus, blood and other medical horror.

EROSTASIS is the first AIF game I’ve played with visuals, so it took me a moment to get over the shock of the imagery and instead focus on how it informs the story. While some of the visuals I would rather not have seen, I cannot deny that they do an excellent job at conveying the blurring of lines between flesh and machinery. Plus, I realize that this is the chance I take when playing AIF.

I really loved the medical horror imagery and gritty aesthetic. My favorites include the (Spoiler - click to show)MRI scan animation in the background of Navigation and the surgical scene at the start of the game. I also liked the red and black tunnel animation for the map section, and some of the medical diagrams- regardless of nudity- were spooky to look at. A visually interesting game.

Also, if you want some advice- The game has a debug mode at the start that allows you to jump to any section in the game. It’s available even if you’ve never played it. I appreciated having this option because some scenes I did not want to revisit.

Using debug mode, here is the playthrough that worked best for me: (Spoiler - click to show) Intro 1 > Intro 2 > Blood (Haemoponics) > Pilot (Navigation) > Slime (Bioremediation) > Ending (Computer Core). The only section that I really couldn’t sit through is the Weapons location. That was the most explicit. Computer Core was the most chill.

There is sound but I did not play with the sound on.

Conclusion
I was compelled to play EROSTASIS because I am a fan of science fiction (and the title sounded cool), and it does offer quite an experience. It focuses more on themes than storyline while also depicting an intriguing story about a biomechanical ship and one’s role within it. In playing this, it also expanded my horizons a bit when it comes to trying AIF.

Hopefully this review will help you decide on whether it’s the game for you. Fine piece of sci-fi/horror erotic fiction. But it's not for everyone.

If you like EROSTASIS and/or Cyberqueen, you might like Mainframe. It’s a Twine game without explicit content but still has an atmospheric amount of body horror.

Humans are becoming obsolete. There are too few resources to sustain our society, and reproductive rates have plummeted. Humanity will soon be yesterday's news.

So, humanity needs a replacement. And your job is to help humanity find it.

Characters
I’m going to start with characters first.

Subject 003
Nothing could prepare the protagonist for the interviewee on the other side of the table. The individual you meet- Subject 003- is a disturbing humanoid-lizard person/species with a 14-vertebra tall neck, translucent skin, misshapen arms (at least I think they have arms, bulging eyes, and lots of teeth. And a comical lisp:

"As thong as they thet me breed, they acknowthedge my superiorithy."

In all fairness, though, they do offer some interesting insights into your questions about politics and morality. Especially when you start arguing with them.

Argue quantum physics
Just agree already

Going off topic can be fun. It may also serve as an opportunity to reflect on how quick we are to judge appearances.

Interviewer
You are a volunteer. In conducting the interview, you are doing your part to save humanity. Which is fortunate since supervisors view you as useless for anything else. You're not asking the questions and then deciding whether the interviewee passes. You are merely a volunteer (not that it seems like you have a choice) asking questions on behalf of an unidentified organization watching through a camera.

The strongest aspect of this game is how effectively it conveys the awkwardness of this interview. You can definitely relate to the protagonist’s feelings of unease as they try to make sense of Subject 003.

I do think it would have been neat to play from the perspective of someone with power, tasked with making final decisions in the fate of humanity rather than as a pawn in larger operation. Still, the player can relate to the protagonist’s responses towards Subject 003.

Gameplay
Human Interview: Subject 003 naturally takes place in an interview room, and you start the gameplay by reading the interview protocols before meeting Subject 003. The objective is to interview them with a list of pre-prepared questions to evaluate if they would be a possible successor for the human race.

Your interactions are under surveillance, and you can receive infractions for any mistakes which can influence the game’s ending. And if things go haywire during the interview process, there’s a kill switch that you can use to terminate them (you then must justify your action to your supervisors).

I didn’t pay much attention to the title of the game at first. I was under the impression that we would get to interview more than one candidate and choose the best successor. Turns out, we only interview one person: Subject 003. Hence the title. I was a bit disappointed with this. I liked the idea of exploring the “pass/fail” concept more thoroughly, but focusing on one character does keep the game at a reasonable length.

Also, the sidebar on the right of the screen has the header "Human Interview Pt 1" which I interpreted as "Part 1," perhaps referring to a chapter in the game or an installment in a series. It makes me wonder if the author had something bigger planned.

Story
Subjects are genetically engineered, combining human DNA with another undisclosed genetic source. I’m not sure exactly how Subject 003’s biology is better suited to survive than your typically human, but one key difference is a willingness to participate in sex.

Human Interview explores the concept of sex becoming obsolete in favor of technological substitutes. This game depicts a future where (Spoiler - click to show) everyone has access to A.I.-driven VR devices that allow users to experience any possible sexual experience that they desire. Why engage with it in real life when you can have a perfect version in a virtual setting? VR is so effective that real sex has fallen out of fashion, causing birth rates to plummet.

Even real-life nudity becomes a surprise. The folks behind the interview room’s camera are like "woah... nice” when you show some skin.

Dialogue suggests that the main reason humans are nearing extinction is because no one wants to have kids anymore. No kids = Humans become extinct when the last generation dies out. Now, the game says that any drastic measure must be taken to ensure that humanity’s legacy is preserved via a successor. Any drastic measure.

But apparently taking a break from your VR device to engage in real sex is too drastic of a measure? We also learn that sexual attraction between the protagonist and Subject 003 is seen as a good thing since reproduction between humans and their successors can always be a last-ditch effort for survival. But this would be pointless since no one wants to engage in actual sex in the first place.

I want to make it clear that while there are sexual themes, the game does not force you into doing anything directly sexual. It gets close to crossing this threshold but mostly limits this content in dialogue. Scenes involving sexual themes are humorous in a twisted way. One of the questions you ask is (Spoiler - click to show)“Do you find me sexually attractive?”

First the player stalls (I did) in asking Subject 003 about sexual attraction. Subject 003 looks you over and asks you to stand up for a better look. You can then escalate the situation or turn it down. It’s so unnerving for the game to pretty much say, "hey, if you want to do it, you can." The idea of having the conversation at all with Subject 003 just makes you think, I’m not getting paid enough for this. Plus, the question is in stark comparison to the other questions, making it more outrageous.

We must know if it has sexual desire. Without it, we're doomed to repeat our extinction.

(Oh, and you’re not getting paid, BTW).

Endings
There are several endings. (Spoiler - click to show) The subject can pass or fail. If they fail, what happens to you depends on your infractions. The “best ending” is when they pass since you get to go back to a VR world of human desire, content that you did your part. There are also a few other outcomes you can find. I’m a little confused about how infractions can affect your chances for success. It seems like infractions can lock the player out of having Subject 003 pass and the best ending. I played several rounds and found it to be a bit confusing.

Visuals
Twine without the frills. Basic black screen with white text. Text is easy to read and evenly spaced. This suits the game just fine.

Conclusion
Human Interview is a game that left me thinking, “What did I just play?” It is one of the most awkward interviews I have found myself in as a player, but that is a strength. You are not supposed to take it too seriously, and there is a strong sentiment of, “Oh, the things we must go for the greater good…”

It could have expanded its concept more by allowing you to interview more than one person. The game would also benefit from some clarity on the story. How much of humanity’s situation is caused by factors out of its control and factors that we can control but chose not to (Spoiler - click to show) (such as relying solely on VR for sex)?

Nonetheless, the twisted humor makes Human Interview encourages you to not bog down on the details. If you can handle its awkwardness, it’s worth a shot.

You are a crew member of a spaceship that has run into a problem. Everyone is dead. Except you. For some reason, your cryo-pod is the only one that did not suffer a malfunction, leaving it up to you to find out what happened.

My guess is that this is the author’s first effort at a parser game. They also note that this is in a Beta stage of development. Please consider this more as feedback than criticism.

Gameplay
It needs a lot of work. My main critique is its lack of interactivity. Any attempt to examine inventory items results in "You see nothing special about the [inventory item]." In addition, room descriptions are unimplemented.

Bridge Hallway
You're here. Not that it was difficult at all, it's just amazing to you. Time to find out what's going on. You slip into a chair besides a large terminal and type in your access code. You read vast ammounts of data, sifting through it all and finding interesting bits of info. TYPE SOUTH TO CONTINUE.

>x terminal
You can't see any such thing.

>read data
You can't see any such thing.

Another example would be the room description for the Cryosubmission Chamber. It says you can check the codex for more info, but all you get is "You see nothing special about the codex.”

Also, the inventory items (codex, plasma welder, keycard, etc.) have no use. Plus, "take all" often results in picking up things that seem a little odd to pick up. Such as the debris and corpses. I don’t think I need to go further with this.

At its most basic, the game is just (Spoiler - click to show) walking through some hallways to reach the ship's bridge . It can be completed in 11 moves. I think it’s safe to say that it has no puzzles. There is one locked door in the Level 1 Hallway, but I could not find a way of unlocking it or breaking into the room, even with the plasma welder and keycard.

Story
We learn that (Spoiler - click to show) Life Support systems malfunctioned, causing your crewmates' bodies to thaw out. We don't actually get to learn anything else. Then (Spoiler - click to show) an asteroid strikes the ship... and has no effect on the gameplay other than to (Spoiler - click to show) have you exit the bridge and step into space. Then it’s over. Simply ends in space. Sparse, but provides an interesting skeleton for a deeper storyline.

Characters
There are four crew members, not including yourself. All we know about them is their first names. Examining their bodies results in generic responses that could have been opportunities to build a little background.

>x captain's corpse
You see nothing special about the Captain's Corpse.

The closest description for the characters we get is if you try to take their pod.

>take captain's pod
The pod is welded to the ship. Our captain, Captain Grant, is here. What a horrid, yet peaceful way to go...

Just something to consider. And we only know that the protagonist is an engineer.

Conclusion
I was hesitant about making my one-star rating influence the game’s overall rating, but I figured it might give it more visibility (or am I wrong on that?). Hopefully my rating does not scare people away from giving it a try and offering feedback since it is clearly a game under development. That said, this game was produced in 2015- a decade ago at the time of this review- and is most likely abandoned. But hey, there is always a possibility. The whole waking up-in-a-cryotube-following-a-disaster scenario may feel overused for some audiences, but I happily devour it.

The author notes that this is supposed to be part of series. If that's the case, I am looking forward to the rest.

This game is a submission to Neo-Twiny Jam 2025 and explores the themes of technology and how we envision our relationship with it.

Gameplay
The driving gameplay mechanic is simple. A line of text appears: “It is 2050.” You then hover over each word until you find a link that provides more exposition about the year 2050.

2050 A.D. - the year of the Moros Program’s deployment into the cyberverse! An AI built to fit all of your needs - to love and care for you! An assistant to human-kind and to be kind to humans!

Would you like to read more?

The game then asks if you want to know more… but the Moros Program isn’t having it. That information is classified (for you, at least). When you click on the phrase “Would you like to read more?”, the game “reboots” and takes you back to the beginning, but this time there is additional text with “It is 2050.” You then find the hidden link in the new text, and the cycle starts again, expanding the game’s narrative.

REBOOT SEQUENCE…

It is 2050.

The Moros Program is watching us daily.

I thought that this was straightforward and set a good outline for the game, especially since it’s so short.

Story
We get our typical cyberpunk dystopian themes: A.I. being inserted into everyday life, an (I assume corporate) entity that watches over everything and wants to be your best friend, censorship, and a Resistance fighting against it all.

In other words, 2025 doesn’t seem like a fun time (and it’s scary to think that 2050 isn’t that far off). To summarize, the Moros Program is run by the mysterious Administration. It takes the stance that A.I. will lead to the betterment of humanity. Now that the Program has taken over the digital landscape, its impact is far-reaching. But if the Administration only has humanity’s bet interests in mind, why is it so opposed to transparency?

Despite this bleak premise, dreamer contains a ray of optimism. There is the sense that no matter how much Moros tries to keep things hidden, people will always seek to find a way around it. To pursue information even as the Administration tries to make it inaccessible. To dream of a better existence. Every time you reboot, you learn more about this possibility. The game ends with (Spoiler - click to show) a plea to join the resistance and live above the norm set by the Administration’s Moros Program. And while it does not go into too much detail, it seems to explore the distinction between wanting to take action and actually taking action.

Visual elements
There is minimal flair in this game, but what flair it does use creates a distinctive cyberpunk vibe that pairs well with the game’s themes. Its appearance consists of a black screen with white text, while hovering over links makes the text turn blue and highlights it with an electric purple colour for a splash of edginess. It’s also easy to engage with the game. The text is organized neatly on the screen and it appropriately uses fade-in/fade-out text effects to give it polish without dragging out the gameplay. A little bit of flair goes a long way.

Conclusion
I enjoyed the cyberpunk themes in dreamer and was impressed with how the game makes good use of the Twiny Jam’s word-limit rule. While I would welcome more backstory on the (Spoiler - click to show) Resistance, it definitely feels like a complete game.

This is such a neat little game! I love sci-fi Twine games, so this was perfect for me.

Echoes of Ending Worlds is a Neo-Twiny Jam submission. You work for the Bureau of Observation as an Operator tasked with screening planetary radio frequencies for signs of life. The basic act of listening and reporting, or as the game puts it: “You Listen, So We Can Learn”, is vital to the Bureau’s efforts to obtain resources, find new settlements, and squash potential threats.

Time to tune in.

Gameplay
Gameplay is brief yet atmospheric- your first playthrough will likely be about two minutes or so. After the game’s intro, which serves as a mission briefing presented by the Bureau, you are presented with your first radio frequency.

You must:

• Observe.
• Record whether there is life, intelligent or unintelligent, or none.
• Suggest if Bureau should investigate, abandon, or re-observe later.

You read through the data audio collected and then make two decisions: whether there is intelligent life present and what action the Bureau should take. The game uses two drop-down menus that allow you to input your decisions before moving on to the next radio frequency. Also note that there is actual audio you can listen to for atmosphere. I, however, played with the sound off after my initial playthrough.

The entire gameplay consists of processing (Spoiler - click to show) three radio frequencies. It then ends in a probation review to evaluate your decisions.

• Suggested new settlement location in dark sector. Nearby mission rerouted to investigate.
• Noted mission distress signal. Rescue pending, awaiting resources. ETA: two months.
• 100% accuracy in observation reports.

Above is what I consider to be my best ending.

I really wish the game was longer, although I recognize that the 2025 Neo-Twiny Jam had a 300-word limit. Given this rule, I think the game makes the most of the amount of content it has through its potency and atmosphere.

There is some replay value. Your choices for each frequency seem to influence the frequency you receive next, and said choices also determine the nature of your (Spoiler - click to show) probation review. After playing several rounds, I encountered a total of (Spoiler - click to show) five planetary frequencies. Seeing how these frequencies could influence each other had my attention and prompted experimentation.

Story
While the game is short, there is still an interesting story to unpack. Right from the beginning, the Bureau of Observation establishes a strong presence. The game strikes a nice ambience by making it clear that the Bureau takes note of everything. That while you are listening to your frequencies, an invisible party is no doubt listening in on you… to make sure to you are doing what you are supposed to be doing, of course.

Also, despite the important nature of your job as an Operator, the PC does not seem to be a high-ranking individual. If anything, they seem to be at the bottom of the bureaucratic food chain. The fact that they are (Spoiler - click to show) under routine probation meetings makes one wonder what their backstory is. Did they step on someone’s toes? Or is this life as usual for everyone in this future?

My favorite aspect of Echoes of Ending Worlds is the overarching story. At the start of the game, the Bureau says, “Every observed frequency saves a manned mission; every planet could be our new home.” My interpretation of this is that Earth isn’t doing too great and that humanity needs a new place to live- a premise I enjoy exploring in science fiction. Missions have been sent out to find a new home, but with limited success. It also (Spoiler - click to show) puts the intro’s mention of an “evac time” into context. There’s not a lot of info, but I’ve pieced together that the people of Earth will have to evacuate at some point, and those who help the Bureau’s efforts earn more priority. We see this in action if you are rewarded for certain gameplay choices. Glad to see that finding an unauthorized settlement shaves off two months’ worth of waiting…

On a final note, I would like to know more about frequency (Spoiler - click to show) Asmer 31 and its status as a Re-observe case. Also, why do you get locked into declaring it “Observe: No Life/Suggest: Abandoned” when you read the frequency’s data? Does anyone have any thoughts on this? There seems to be a deeper story going on, but all I can say for certain is that the Bureau is not pleased with your assessment.

System scans indicate Observer’s report on Asmer 31 inaccurate: life signs detected. Observer hostile to this report. Psych eval requested.

What this psych eval looks like is never revealed. Let’s hope it’s nothing bad.

Visual elements
The game’s appearance is a dark blue-grey panel set into a background of the same colour. The text consists of crisp orange and white font and is evenly placed on the screen. I liked how the text included basic interactivity where the player clicks on passages for more descriptions about what is being heard over the radio frequency. It keeps the screen from becoming cluttered and makes things more interesting.

The credits list several images, but I never saw them in the game. Unless of course it has to do with a technical problem on my end. I don’t think the lack of photos takes away from the game’s presentation since it already has a “less-is-more” aesthetic.

Conclusion
Echoes of Ending Worlds is a game with a great concept both in gameplay mechanics and story concept. The premise of turning to the void of space in search of a new future amid an ongoing planetary crisis is a powerful one. Anytime we ponder the possibility of life in the universe we are forced to evaluate our relationship with the Earth and confront our ability to leave it. These themes immediately caught my attention, and I spent many playthroughs trying to digest every detail I could find. I would love to see a longer, expanded version of the game since I didn’t want it to end, but it still stands on its own as it is now.

Alone in the Void is a promising Quest game about waking up from cryonic suspension on a ship called the Amaethon drifting through deep space. Twenty years have passed since you woke up, and since then, something has happened. You just need to figure out what it is… and whether it is a threat to you.

The game falls under the sci-fi subgenre where the protagonist investigates a seemingly lifeless spaceship after an unknown incident. Games following this premise that I have reviewed include A Long Way to the Nearest Star, Fall of the Achilles, and Reclamation. Each time I play a game like this I am always eager to find out what happened.

Gameplay
The gameplay starts in your crew quarters after the ship’s computer guides you there upon your awakening from cryonic suspension. Rise and shine! While the messiness of your living space has not changed, the same cannot be said for the rest of the ship.

From the crew quarters, you wander in search of leads. There are no specific objectives or tasks/checklists that the protagonist must pursue. Everything is exploratory, simply trying to figure out what happened to the ship while you were frozen.

There are occasional small bugs and some situational limitations that were frustrating. Such as the (Spoiler - click to show) bathroom stalls in the deck 4 bathroom.

There are five stalls in the bathroom. Four have signs that read “Occupied.” Normally, the decision is obvious. Move on and perhaps check out the stall with no one in it (don’t, actually). From a practical standpoint, given that this ship has supposedly been abandoned for the past 20 years, I feel that some persistence is warranted as part of your investigation. I wish there were a way to knock on the stalls or somehow confirm the occupants/contents of the stall.

Unless there really, really, really is nothing in there for the protagonist. In that case, forget I asked.

Atmosphere
Something bad has happened, that is clear, but there is not a lot of urgency that directs the gameplay. It feels more as if the spaceship is your personal playground following the aftermath of some event that took the rest of the crew while you were on ice. However, there is one exception that deserves acknowledgement.

It comes while you are (Spoiler - click to show) sitting in the seat in the theater. Without warning and in red text:

As you pause to watch the screen, a sudden sound catches your attention from the recesses of the room. You swivel your head toward the source of the disturbance, only to spot a shadowy figure looming near the closed entrance to the lobby.

And if you wait too long, it appears again. Uh oh.

Timed responses can receive mixed reception with players, but the time margin here is reasonable and effectively atmospheric. It comes out of nowhere and the timing is right to surprise you, spurring you into action.

Finally…
Ultimately, I enjoyed the gameplay even if the atmosphere was underwhelming at times. It is fun because it has a free-for-all self-driven mayhem where loot everything in sight, demonstrate a blatant disregard for locked doors, and grill NPCs for answers (Spoiler - click to show) (see, you’re not so alone after all). While this sort of behavior is often found in similar games, Alone in the Void manages to cultivate a chaotic carelessness that is unique to its plot.

Before I move on, I have some praise for Alone in the Void: The gameplay lacks the sluggishness I often encounter in Quest games. Generally, I don’t think sluggishness is the author’s fault. I usually assume it is a Quest-related technicality. Perhaps it is a computer or browser issue on my part.

Either way, sluggishness slurps the fun out of the gameplay, especially if the game decides to suddenly end while you pause to do something else on another tab. That happens a lot when I play Quest games. While Alone in the Void is not completely exempt from this, it was a smooth ride that took longer to time out when I paused to do something else. Whatever caused this made a difference.

Puzzles
For anyone unfamiliar with Quest, most Quest games have three menus on the right side of the screen for exits, player inventory, and objects in the player’s surroundings. Clicking on items in a menu reveals a set of possible verbs for said object, which helps eliminate guess-the-verb confusion. Through this, you can even skip a keyboard altogether, although I still prefer to use one.

While some Quest games are designed so that navigation via the side menus can be ignored, that is not the case with Alone in the Void. It seems that some puzzles can only be solved by navigating menu options. This was both a strength and weakness. As of *now, puzzles are limited to unlocking doors. One example involves (Spoiler - click to show) entering the cafeteria.

The location description outside the cafeteria reads:

You are in a Hallway on Deck 4.
You can see a Cafeteria Door, Elevator 4 and a Terminal.
You can go down, west, east, north or up.

Examining the cafeteria door says, "But a keen eye will reveal a tiny hole, a chink in the armor - a minuscule orifice tucked away under the words 'Emergency Release.’”

> x hole
The emergency hole is built into the Cafeteria door. Its too narrow for your fingers to fit... maybe if you had something pointed.

The object for the job is the nasty toothbrush from your locker.

However, “Put toothbrush in hole” results in “You can’t do that,” while “unlock door with toothbrush” gets “That doesn’t work.” And no, "use toothbrush" does not work either. The protagonist puts it in their mouth instead. Gross.

The solution to (Spoiler - click to show) using the toothbrush to unlock the door requires use of the “Places and Objects” menu.

Clicking on the (Spoiler - click to show) "Cafeteria Door" link reveals two options that say, "Look at," and "Unlock." If the toothbrush is in your inventory, clicking “Unlock” will automatically unlock the door. This is quite helpful if you are unsure of what item is needed to unlock a barrier. If you gather as many items as you can there is a good chance that no door will stand in your way when you go to unlock it.

Does this detract from the puzzle solving experimentation? A little bit since typing out commands gives the impression that the command itself has no use. But the tradeoff is that it increases player friendliness in the sense that, when it comes to applying the right inventory item to a task, the game “does it all for you.” If you (Spoiler - click to show) have the toothbrush, the game takes care of unlocking the door.

Once I figured out this trick, I was never stuck. But maybe that will (Spoiler - click to show) change later when more of the game is released.

*Initially I wondered whether this could be dismissed as a non-spoiler, but since the argument could probably go either way, I’m playing it safe when I say this: (Spoiler - click to show) Alone in the Void is not a complete game. Eventually you will run into a message saying, “To be continued.” I’m not sure if calling it a demo would be accurate. Sometimes, you can advertise a game as such without it necessarily being considered a spoiler, but since Alone in the Void ends on a cliffhanger, I’m spoiler tagging it.

Story
Alone in the Void is a science fiction game with a mix of horror and mystery. It includes some gore and bathroom humor, and it's no joke when I say that the protagonist seems willing to eat most everything. Like the (Spoiler - click to show) urinal cake. Ugh. There is a bit of a gross factor there, but not too much.

The overarching story behind the Amaethon is surreal, eerie, and thought provoking. It seems that we live in a reality where mainstream space travel exists, but light-speed travel is off-limits. Currently, no ship can go faster than half of the speed of light.

For the past twenty years the Amaethon has been drifting farther into deep space to the point where no other ship, burdened by speed limitations, can match its distance. (Assuming that the Amaethon’s momentum is slinging it faster than any ship sent to track it down. Otherwise, a ship would eventually catch up. However, the Amaethon has a 20-year head start.) What an interesting situation to ponder.

Other than that, an immediate story is still emerging. Like I said, (Spoiler - click to show) the game ends on a cliffhanger.

Characters
PC
The gameplay keeps details on the protagonist at a minimum. We know they are a member of the crew and not much else. While they come off as gender neutral in the gameplay, the cover art hints that we are playing as a male protagonist. It would be cool to learn more. I wonder if they are simply underdeveloped or if there is a big secret about their identity.

I do think that the game needs to be clearer about the protagonist’s role on the ship. Initially I thought that they were in cryogenic suspension on a smaller ship sent to investigate the Amaethon. Once having found the Amaethon twenty years later, the protagonist would be awakened to board the lost vessel.

Not quite. The gameplay soon tells a different story. It seems instead that they were already frozen on the Amaethon and awakened by the ship's computer for an unknown reason. The closest answer is (Spoiler - click to show) from Sophie Malaca, an injured officer in the cafeteria.

You: "Do you know what's happening on this ship? or where everybody is?"
Sophie: "I know about as much as you do, according to all the callanders on board its been twenty years"
You: "From what I've seen so far it looks like people left in a hurry too"
Sophie: "So much so they left two officers on Ice? .... lovely"

(Note: there are some grammar and spelling errors in this game.)

In this exchange, it seems that "officers on ice" refers to crew being put into cryogenic suspension and that Sophie, like you, were frozen and awakened by the computer after twenty years of slumber. But when she says, “they left two officers on Ice,” I wondered who's "they?"

Who gets frozen and why? My guess is that crew are either frozen in emergency situations for their own safety or that designated crew members are frozen and awakened in the event of an emergency to investigate. I doubt (Spoiler - click to show) Sophie has been lounging around in the cafeteria for the past two decades. But all I have right now are speculations.

NPCs
There are (Spoiler - click to show) three NPCs. (Spoiler - click to show) Sophie Malaca (as I mentioned), the robotic toaster in the kitchen, and the automaton upstairs. I wish these characters would respond to a wider range of prompts. Especially (Spoiler - click to show) Sophie since she is the only crew member in sight. Like you, she just emerged from cryonic suspension, most likely before you did.

She also later turns into an undead monster and corners you in the movie theater.

While I can understand why the (Spoiler - click to show) robotic toaster is limited linguistically, I was expecting more from (Spoiler - click to show) Sophie, a fellow crewmember. It would extremely helpful if her character was more responsive since she seems to be the only NPC capable of answering any substantial questions.

What surprised me is that she has a gaping wound (most likely the source of the mess in the bathroom) and you cannot even ask about it. Or the military bandages packet that you found or maybe the ship’s failing power levels. And as for investigating the ship…

You: "Okay, I'm going to continue searching, but I'll come back for you"
Sophie: "You better! - Also becareful, that thing... whatever it is, it's still out there"

Hold on, Sophie. What thing?

That sounds like something we should be able to ask about. My guess is that this “thing” lurking around the ship is responsible for her injury (and later transforming her into an undead creature), and yet she has nothing to say about it when you ask for clarification. Absolutely no response at all.

This also seems like a big plot element. Sadly, we cannot learn more about this development.

Thoughts on setting
This spaceship sci-fi/mystery (and sometimes horror) subgenre often features research or military spaceships as the setting. The Amaethon falls into a similar category, a mining vessel. However, the Amaethon is also a bit unusual. Let’s just say that the ship’s function is not conveyed by its contents. I would never have guessed that it was a mining vessel had the game never told me.

Instead, the Amaethon’s layout gives the impression of a “party ship” or one dedicated solely to leisure. The parts of the ship accessible to the player includes a (Spoiler - click to show) trashed bathroom with a vending machine that sells- you’ll see, an arcade, a movie theater, and a general “store” that strikes you as being anywhere but on a near powerless mining vessel drifting in deep space.

Aside from the (Spoiler - click to show) excess blood pooling on the bathroom floor and Sophie’s injury, The Amaethon gives the overwhelming impression of the aftermath of wild party in a rented venue the night before. This is not necessarily a complaint. It was a fun surprise to see that the game diverts from a generic starship floor plan. I do wonder, however, when the mining part comes into play.

So far exploration offers little explanation of the ship’s mission (if it ever had one in the first place) or its activities with mining. It leaves the player with questions, but hopefully more will be revealed in the future.

Visuals
Alone in the Void has some of the coolest graphics I have ever seen in a Quest game to date. Amaethon seems to have had some serious gamers. And film fans.

There is an (Spoiler - click to show) arcade (plus a Game Boy left behind) and a movie theater. Looking at the screen in the movie theater prompts a clip to play as if you were watching a projection on a screen. Playing video games reveals a clip of the game in action. Even though the player has no control over the (Spoiler - click to show) clip, it is still impressive and gives the gameplay extra dimension.

Also, the game uses a simple but pleasing colour scheme of a black screen with white text and orange links plus accents. Consistent colour coordination can create a more polished look. Sometimes the game will stray from this and use colour coding for dialog or warning text that includes red, yellow, and purple colours. Overall, Alone in the Void has a crisp appearance.

Final thoughts
While (Spoiler - click to show) I was sad that the game ended on a cliffhanger, I applauded the author for making a game that leaves the player curious for more. Its implementation is not perfect and lacks fewer story details about than what I would have liked, but I am also keeping an open mind since the game (Spoiler - click to show) is still under development. The author has already established a concrete foundation of gameplay and setting that sets it apart from other games and carries much potential.

Alone in the Void is a strong addition to the current sci-fi selections of games made with Quest. I hope the author continues to shape it.