Ratings and Reviews by Simon Deimel

View this member's profile

Show reviews only | ratings only
View this member's reviews by tag: german
Previous | 441–450 of 615 | Next | Show All


Halb Zwei, by Florian Edlbauer
Simon Deimel's Rating:

Trapped, by Kate Barnard
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
An exercise, January 17, 2014
by Simon Deimel (Germany)

Basically this was probably a programming exercise, so it is centered around some common tropes such as obtaining keys of different colors and unlocking corresponding doors. It is just what an author does to check out the mechanics of an engine (I did the same and later expanded the results).

It is short and I cannot say that it is really bad. The solutions can quite easily be found and I did not encounter too annoying moments that made me give up. There is a good will behind it, it contains a story (more or less) and it is finishable. Of course there could have been more to this and it cannot be compared with the masterpieces of interactive fiction, but for a first try it is okay.

You can log in to rate this review, mute this user, or add a comment.

The Minimalist, by Mark Cook
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
Good one, January 17, 2014
by Simon Deimel (Germany)

All in all a very good game with a tight story, probably influenced by the Matrix movies. Considering the short time in which it was assembled we can overlook missing implementations and little inaccuracies (there should not be the possibility to drop a tattoo, for instance). Regarding the fact that Quest was used for creating this game, I instantly tried the "use a on/with b" command when I did not find the required synthax, and mostly it turned out to be what the program was waiting for (as opposed to Inform, Quest contains "use" as a standard verb). For instance, in a certain situation I was unable to put one thing into a container, but instead could use it on the latter; or I could not enter a certain device, but use it instead.

The game contains two endings and I discovered the bad one first -- the game then mentions that there is a better ending and suggests further investigation, so replay is encouraged.

The puzzles are quite logic and once you get accustomed to the "use a on/with b" command, you can easily make progress. I recommend this game to everyone who likes a short science fiction story and does not back off from the mechanics (which sometimes may appear unusual to many gamers).

You can log in to rate this review, mute this user, or add a comment.

GameBook Guide, by R. J. Kenny
Simon Deimel's Rating:

Broken, by Claudio Medina
Simon Deimel's Rating:

Mathematicism, by JAXON
Simon Deimel's Rating:

Burn the Koran and Die, by Poster
Simon Deimel's Rating:

Five Words (go go go), by Big Shell Incident
Simon Deimel's Rating:

Wheel, by John Toomey
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
Serves its purpose, January 14, 2014
by Simon Deimel (Germany)

The project consists of a room and an art object to fiddle around with. There is no aim, no plot, just the art object. This is an interactive art show, not a game.
The main thing to do is to turn the wheels and get random sentences as a result, which is entertaining for at least some minutes (not a spoiler, there is not much more to do). The implementation is sparse, not very thorough outside of this context; but the actions are centered on spinning the wheels and reading the sentences. I tried to examine the parts connected to the wheels, but I did not get to know much more; the only deceisive thing to do was to spin the wheels, and that worked fine.
I would have liked some more implementations, more to examine about the wheels. An exit of the room could have been provided to leave the art show, it would have been more authentic.
I like the main idea despite the aforementioned shortcomings.

You can log in to rate this review, mute this user, or add a comment.

Laboratory Madness, by Giggling_Kiste
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
Quite okay, January 14, 2014*
by Simon Deimel (Germany)

It is a fun story about a scientist trying to make up some inventions. The inventions and the way how to (randomly) find them is entertaining enough. Unfortunately there is no handling of choices which already have been made, so they can be repeated over and over again; it would have been better to take them away from the list of choices after they have been chosen, because the gameplay gets confusing when the player decides to chose them for a second time and the result is just the same.
(Spoiler - click to show)The occurence of time travels does not explain this, because this aspect aims at different parts of the story.
A negative thing is that I did not find an ending... or maybe I missed it?
The basic premise is not bad though, and maybe this could be improved in a later version one day.

* This review was last edited on January 18, 2014
You can log in to rate this review, mute this user, or add a comment.


Previous | 441–450 of 615 | Next | Show All