There are no known download links for this game. |
Have you played this game?
You can rate this game, record that you've played it, or put it on your wish list after you log in. |
(based on 2 ratings) 1 review
About the Story
an exploration of gaps, omissions, lacunae, and loops with regard to sex-words in Samuel Johnson's 1755 "Dictionary of the English Language"
Game Details
Language: English (en) First Publication Date: June 8, 2014 Current Version: 1.1
License: Creative Commons Development System: Twine
IFID: Unknown
TUID:
ctdbm54ewxq4szw
|
Tags
Member Reviews
5 star: | | (0) | 4 star: | | (0) | 3 star: | | (1) | 2 star: | | (1) | 1 star: | | (1) |
| Average Rating:  Number of Reviews: 1 Write a review |
3 of
3 people found the following review helpful:
Circular Reference, March 22, 2015This does (almost) precisely what it says on the tin: it is a linkified version of a sex and gender-related subset of Johnson's dictionary, plus some marginalia-like notations representing the thoughts of a reader, which suggest other cross-references.
Poking around in dictionary-like things can be fun; Diana Wynne Jones’ Tough Guide to Fantasyland could probably be considered as a CYOA (if so, it’d be one of the better ones). There, however, a lot of the enjoyment is of the discovery kind. This is more of a twinebound (adj. used of any work of choice-based interactive fiction in which the player’s experience of constrained or denied agency is a central rhetorical point) piece, the dictionary looping back heavily on itself in circular definitions and elision, relying on cultural assumptions which it avoids explaining.
I enjoy digging through old books dealing with sexuality – one of my most prized books is W.J. Truitt’s Nature’s Secrets Revealed: Scientific Knowledge of the Laws of Sex Life and Heredity, a Christian eugenics health-manual published in Ohio in 1916. The fun, in that kind of thing, lies in discovery: you know in general the variety of awfulness that it’s going to express, but the pleasure lies in finding strange extended metaphors, over-the-top illustrations, turns of phrase, weird theoretical deviations from the expected script. The much more constrained forms of dictionary entries means that DWitD doesn’t really provide any of that. So, a neat idea, but not as interesting as that idea promised to be.
This is version 6 of this page, edited by Autymn Castleton
on 17 December 2017 at 2:00am.
- View Update History
- Edit This Page
- Add a News Item