Enlightenment

by Taro Ogawa

Cave crawl, Zorkian
1998

Return to the game's main page

Reviews and Ratings

5 star:
(3)
4 star:
(19)
3 star:
(14)
2 star:
(4)
1 star:
(0)
Average Rating:
Number of Ratings: 40
Write a review


Previous | << 1 2 >> | Next | Show All


- perching path (near Philadelphia, PA, US), December 19, 2009

6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
Well Thought Out, Poorly Implimented, December 8, 2009
by tggdan3 (Michigan)

First of all, I love the premise of this game. You are already finished with an adventure in the underground, bundled up with light to avoid (grues) and there's a troll guarding the exit. To defeat him, you must turn out all the lights so the grues will eat him.

Sounds great, right? Problem is that the puzzles have seemingly random solutions. I like games like this, but when I was forced to look at the hints and say "Um... what?" I knew the game had problems.

For example, you have to target pieces of items that are not adequetely described. The size of items is not described and is relevant. One puzzle didn't make sense even after I solved it. (It makes sense, but I still don't see how I was supposed to guess it.) And guessing is the key to solving the puzzles.

I like the concept, and the writing is solid, but keep in mind, you'll be finding yourself typing "put all in [x]" just to see what fits where. And don't be surprised if things that should work just don't.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

- tinroof, October 12, 2009

- GDL (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), July 30, 2009

- Stephen Gilbert (Canada), July 24, 2009

- googoogjoob, May 20, 2009

- Wesley (Iowa City, Iowa), September 1, 2008

- tylluan (Vermont), August 24, 2008

- Anders Hellerup Madsen (Copenhagen, Denmark), July 21, 2008

- dfreas, July 1, 2008

12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
I hate to be contrarian, but..., June 6, 2008
by Jimmy Maher (Oslo, Norway)

This game seems to be quite well-regarded by many, popping up in conversation fairly frequently despite having been released way back in 1998 by an author who has not to my knowledge done any IF work before or since. I wish I could say it impressed me as well, but it left me rather cold, both when I first played it back in the day and now when I return to it.

It certainly does have its strengths. The premise is that you are at the end of a much longer game, faced with solving the last few puzzles to escape a (if not The) great underground empire. This "ending of an (imaginary) longer game" riff is an idea that has been used several times since, to the point that it's become a bit cliched, but I can't hold that against this game. The writing is both technically proficient and generally clever, if unoriginal, being a rather slavish imitation of the "high Infocom" style. Technically, the game is also worthy of Infocom, being polished and bug-free.

But then we get to the puzzles. They're difficult. Very, very difficult, at least for me, and difficult in all the wrong ways. I don't see myself ever solving this without just trying random actions for the hell of it -- not really my kind of fun even then and certainly not now. When I give up on a game and go to the hints, I am guaranteed to react in one of two ways: either to be angry at myself for failing to think about THAT, or to be angry at the game for not playing fair. Suffice to say my reaction here was always the latter. Its worst sin is a failure to properly describe to me essential properties of objects that I need to be aware of to solve its puzzles: one object is sharp enough to be used for cutting, but I am never informed of this; a couple of others' sizes are of critical importance, but said sizes are never described; etc. It's a pity, as the central thing you are trying to achieve, and from which the game takes its name, IS clever and DOES give you a nice Ah-ha! moment when you figure it out. Unfortunately, solving the meta-puzzle just opens the door to lots of fiddly, under-clued frustration in trying to enact that solution.

I'm probably the wrong audience for this game in the end, which is why I'm not going to blast it too badly in scoring it. I'm just tired of puzzles that are an exercise in patience and frustration, and Infocom homages are not really what I'm looking for in my IF these days. If you do carry a hankering for the old-school days of Zork, though, and want to really be challenged, this may be right up your alley.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

- Dave Chapeskie (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada), April 23, 2008

- Orthos (London), March 10, 2008

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
Nails that classic Zork feel..., March 10, 2008

I knew I liked Enlightenment right from the start. Sure, Taro Ogawa (the author) has appropriated just about every last detail from the Zork universe, but he does it so well that you can't help but forgive him. This game is not just fan-boy homage or unimaginative plagiarism, this game is something new that was lovingly crafted using familiar elements. This game is Zork turned up to 11.

As in Zork, the game's terse replies are just encouraging enough to get you to continue for another few moves even when you feel stuck. Perhaps it's because this game emulates that iconic look-and-feel so well that I had the patience to keep trying after nearly an hour of play without a single point scored. Yes, there is that much non-essential material to keep you busy, with many jokes to discover, footnotes to unlock, and interesting-but-not-useful things you can do with the assortment of equipment you start with.

The game's title is well-chosen; once that first point is scored, they become easier and easier. For the last few turns of my game, everything fell into place, and I felt I truly had achieved enlightenment.

The game's end notes state that this piece is actually 19K larger than the original Zork I. I am surprised, but not too surprised. No course of action seems inherently off-limits or "wrong" for this game -- a difficult-to-achieve perceptual illusion that is no doubt the product of vast amounts of coding work and exceptionally careful playtesting on the author's part. Mr. Ogawa is to be congratulated for having pulled it off.

Enlightenment is a one-room game that you wish would go on to "feature length." Though Mr. Ogawa seems to have never produced another piece for public release, I sincerely hope to see more by him in the future.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

- flatluigi (Massachusetts, USA), March 6, 2008

- J. Robinson Wheeler (Austin, TX), February 22, 2008

Baf's Guide


A real adventurer never passes up a magical light source with unlimited power, but when darkness is desirable, all those extra photon producers can become seemingly-insurmountable obstacles. A fun one-room Zorkian game with difficult but solvable tinkering puzzles. Features adaptive hints.

-- Carl Muckenhoupt

You wrote this review - Revise it | Direct link | Add a comment


Previous | << 1 2 >> | Next | Show All | Return to game's main page